Teams

Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-13vs Bridgemill (Marlyn Wagner)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesKay Cruickshank / Susan Rasmussen vs Paula Jameson / Jennifer Kennedy6-1, 3-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Bonnie Oliver6-3, 3-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Coskrey / Pam Inman vs Carrie Morton / Amber Prosser6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWanda Lucas / Linda McDaniel vs Tara Moody / Lindsay Tubbs6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesMary Martin / Sue Noreuil vs Lee Evans / Lynda Poulos6-3, 6-3
2026-01-06vs The Manor (Mali Hu)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesBarbara Coskrey / Mary Martin vs Lisa Landau / Mali Hu1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Leticia Fernandez6-1, 6-7, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Rasmussen / Sally Smith vs April Marler / Gretchen Golden7-5, 4-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKay Cruickshank / Linda McDaniel vs Amanda Kapp / Aneta Blanco6-2, 6-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesDiane Hines / Lisa Whigham vs Patrice Chishom / Angela Yu-Norris2-6, 6-2, 0-6
2025-12-09vs Brookfield (Caulie Hamling)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesBarbara Coskrey / Sally Smith vs Katie Beam / Jacqueline Morin2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Angela Drake3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPam Inman / Mary Martin vs Laura Legg / Katy Vogel6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSue Noreuil / Donna Schaaf vs Scarlotte West / Rebecca Meredith2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLuann Pierce / Deborah Shields vs Shannon Shryock / Jessica Dean3-6, 3-6
2025-12-03vs Crooked Creek (Elaine Mitchell)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesDonna Schaaf / Sue Noreuil vs Elaine Mitchell / Madeline Jove4-6, 6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Madeline Gmahle6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Shields / Susan Rasmussen vs Lisa Rivas / Jodi Ketter6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Whigham / Diane Hines vs Terri Wigger / Carrie Holley7-6, 0-6, 6-4
W#4 DoublesWanda Lucas / Alice Bell vs Suzanne Compton / Kelly Battaglia6-3, 6-3
2025-11-18vs Harrison TC (Michele Sweeney)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesDonna Schaaf / Sally Smith vs Susan Childers / Chaitra Nayak Mallya4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Lyuba Hubbs7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKay Cruickshank / Sue Noreuil vs Sayaka Onishi / Paola Rouhizad7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda McDaniel / Susan Rasmussen vs Jana Woodruff / Nicole VanBruinisse6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesAlice Bell / Luann Pierce vs Jessica Bateman / Linda Ostrowski5-7, 4-6
2025-11-04vs Foxhall (Dawn Anderson)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesPam Inman / Sally Smith vs Laurie Dostie / Jennifer Autian4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Tucker vs Susan Hardy6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWanda Lucas / Luann Pierce vs Sabrina Vera / Leslie Harper4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Martin / Deborah Shields vs Vicky Wyche / Leanna Lee4-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesAlice Bell / Lisa Whigham vs Annie Merrill / Mary Murphy4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Christie Tucker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Kay Cruickshank
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Linda McDaniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Sally Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Pam Inman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Lisa Whigham
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Diane Hines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Sue Noreuil
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Luann Pierce
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Alice Bell
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Donna Schaaf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Wanda Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Barbara Coskrey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Deborah Shields
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mary Martin
published
Susan Rasmussen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda McDaniel + Susan Rasmussen51342% games+0.9% vs expected
Wanda Lucas + Luann Pierce0737% games−0.6% vs expected
Lisa Whigham + Luann Pierce5751% games−1.0% vs expected
Alice Bell + Diane Hines41138% games−3.4% vs expected
Diane Hines + Luann Pierce41336% games−7.1% vs expected
Diane Hines + Deborah Shields2530% games−8.9% vs expected
Diane Hines + Susan Rasmussen61742% games−11.7% vs expected
Sally Smith + Donna Schaaf1738% games−13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christie Tucker
21W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Kay Cruickshank
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Linda McDaniel
38W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Sally Smith
9W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Pam Inman
22W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Lisa Whigham
24W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Diane Hines
37W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Sue Noreuil
16W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.67
Luann Pierce
14W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Alice Bell
23W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Donna Schaaf
16W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
Wanda Lucas
30W–108L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Barbara Coskrey
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Deborah Shields
7W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Mary Martin
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Rasmussen
43W–87L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.