Teams

2-LGilchrist CHCC 40 3.0

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs 1-KTravis-WWLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarci Hansen / Christy Lewis vs Krissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKara Andrews / Dorene Palermo vs Katie Elder / Lindsay Terrell5-7, 4-6
2023-04-24vs 5-Everett-Craver-HVCCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarci Hansen / Christy Lewis vs Elizabeth Everett / Stacey Smith6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKara Andrews / Dorene Palermo vs Margaret Smith / Susan Peak1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-10vs 3-LWollman-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKara Andrews / Christy Lewis vs Myra Jester / Lee Wollman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarci Hansen / Cheryl Symons vs Laurie Oakley / Janis Tillman6-4, 7-5
2023-03-30vs 5-Everett-Craver-HVCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristy Lewis / Kara Andrews vs Elizabeth Albright / Courtney Mumford6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Hightower / Marci Hansen vs Tiffanie Hoover / Ann Craver7-6, 6-4
2023-03-20vs 1-KTravis-WWLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarci Hansen / Leslye Rood vs Tracey Maurer / Lisa Hsu0-6, 0-6
2023-03-06vs 3-LWollman-CHCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesMarci Hansen vs Stacey Lange0-6, 2-6
2023-02-20vs 4-LKieffer-FARMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarci Hansen vs Jennifer Gates-Foster6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKara Andrews / Christy Lewis vs Anne Heymann / LAURIE KIEFFER6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Marci Hansen
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Laura Porter
published
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
published
2.65
Dorene Palermo
published
2.48
Kara Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.42
Maggie Hanes
published
2.25
Leslye Rood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Gilchrist + Laura Porter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marci Hansen
51W–29L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Laura Porter
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Linda Gilchrist
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carolyn Hightower
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Dorene Palermo
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Kara Andrews
8W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Maggie Hanes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.42
Leslye Rood
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.