Teams

Davis, Tim

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-10vs McFatter, DanielSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWesley Whitehead / Scott Stanton vs Russell Dendy / Dario Rosa6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Carmody vs Derek Howard6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKeith Hudson / Jason McKnatt vs Michael Collins / Hunter Logan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Johns / Dean Lester vs Kevin McKay / Stephen Langley0-6, 3-6
2025-04-03vs Howell, BryanLost 04
L#1 DoublesTim Davis / Wesley Whitehead vs Bryan Howell / Andrew Haile4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Carmody vs Chandler Strain6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNick Morgan / Todd Johns vs Mark Hardin / Ricky Cousino3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Doug Burgess vs Jeff Hardin / Alan Hargett1-6, 1-6
2025-03-27vs Williamson, GregSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTim Davis / Wesley Whitehead vs Austin O'Brien / Jeffrey Martin6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDoug Burgess vs Ronnie Rogers1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Carmody / Easy Biedenharn vs David Bartley / Jay Wheatley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Thomas / Jason McKnatt vs Moin Imran / Bill Alvis6-2, 6-2
2025-03-20vs McFatter, DanielWon 30
W#1 DoublesWesley Whitehead / Tim Davis vs Hunter Logan / Chris Carlton6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDoug Burgess vs Graham Bucciantini7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTodd Johns / Nick Morgan vs David Ellis / Dario Rosa6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-20vs McFatter, DanielWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharles Hudspeth / Wesley Whitehead vs Dario Rosa / Chris Carlton6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKeith Hudson / Nick Morgan vs Mitch Rayborn / Hunter Logan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Stanton / Jason McKnatt vs Graham Bucciantini / Brandon Easterwood6-1, 6-2
2025-03-06vs Howell, BryanLost 12
W#1 DoublesNick Morgan / Jeffrey Carmody vs Lane Clower / Chris Lee5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Wesley Whitehead vs Mark Hardin / Ricky Cousino0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Johns / Travis Finseth vs Alan McCormick / Lee Gladden3-6, 4-6
2025-02-27vs Williamson, GregWon 31
W#1 DoublesTravis Finseth / Scott Stanton vs Moin Imran / Austin O'Brien6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDoug Burgess vs Tim Mask2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Thomas / Todd Johns vs Bill Alvis / Phillip Pace6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTim Davis / Jason McKnatt vs Jay Wheatley / Jeffrey Martin6-3, 6-3
2025-02-13vs Howell, BryanLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Hudspeth / Jeffrey Carmody vs Lane Clower / Alan McCormick5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDoug Burgess / Nick Morgan vs Andrew Haile / Bryan Howell7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Thomas / Scott Stanton vs Lee Gladden / Ricky Cousino4-6, 3-6
2025-02-06vs Williamson, GregWon 20
W#1 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Charles Hudspeth vs Moin Imran / Bill Alvis6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTodd Johns / Nick Morgan vs Jay Wheatley / Jeffrey Martin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Davis, Tim63181838326
2McFatter, Daniel27142248367
3Williamson, Greg1892756368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jeffrey Carmody
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.60
Wesley Whitehead
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.45
Charles Hudspeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Easy Biedenharn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Travis Finseth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Dean Lester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Nick Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.16
Todd Johns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Scott Stanton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Jason McKnatt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Doug Burgess
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Johns + Nick Morgan4254% gamesnot enough data
Easy Biedenharn + Charles Hudspeth224 matchesnot enough data
Todd Johns + Dean Lester123 matchesnot enough data
Doug Burgess + Jason McKnatt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Carmody
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Wesley Whitehead
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Charles Hudspeth
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Easy Biedenharn
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Travis Finseth
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Dean Lester
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Nick Morgan
39W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Todd Johns
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Scott Stanton
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Jason McKnatt
8W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Doug Burgess
30W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.