Teams

Hawaiian Slices

2025 Legends League (Spring) · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.09 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-05vs Shades of GreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Candace Pahukula vs Sally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDoreen Morinaga / Riko Kuroki vs Barbara Lowe / Debbie Au6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLynette Furukawa / PJ Ellison vs Allynne Tom / Elaine Yoshinaga1-6, 2-6
2025-02-26vs Shades of GreyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Shingle / Raelene Domingues vs Marilyn Nakamura / Setsuko Tamura1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Pahukula / PJ Ellison vs Suzanne Bernstein / Barbara Lowe2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRiko Kuroki / Lynette Furukawa vs Allynne Tom / Sally Takamine3-6, 3-6
2025-02-19vs Shades of GreyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Griffon / Susan Shingle vs Marilyn Nakamura / Barbara Lowe2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Ilene Samson vs Debbie Au / Kathleen Teruya2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDoreen Morinaga / Lynette Furukawa vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Ann Chun5-7, 3-6
2025-02-12vs Shades of GreyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Candace Pahukula vs Allynne Tom / Rinda Fernandes7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Griffon / Raelene Domingues vs Sally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Shingle / Monica McClelland vs Barbara Lowe / Phyllis Tsukayama2-6, 2-6
2025-02-05vs Shades of GreyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Doreen Morinaga vs Debbie Au / Ann Chun1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIlene Samson / Riko Kuroki vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Kathleen Teruya3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPJ Ellison / Lynette Furukawa vs Elaine Yoshinaga / Suzanne Bernstein3-6, 4-6
2025-01-29vs Shades of GreyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica McClelland / Karen Griffon vs Elaine Yoshinaga / Marilyn Nakamura7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Ilene Samson vs Sally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynette Furukawa / PJ Ellison vs Suzanne Bernstein / Debbie Au5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-24vs Shades of GreyLost 02
L#2 DoublesPJ Ellison / June Ching vs Ann Chun / Rinda Fernandes0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRaelene Domingues / Susan Shingle vs Kathleen Teruya / Marilyn Nakamura4-6, 3-6
2025-01-15vs Shades of GreyLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaelene Domingues / Riko Kuroki vs Elaine Yoshinaga / Sally Takamine6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Ichinose / Karen Griffon vs Rinda Fernandes / Allynne Tom1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJune Ching / Ilene Samson vs Suzanne Bernstein / Phyllis Tsukayama0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shades of Grey802229139
2Hawaiian Slices0822244274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Raelene Domingues
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Riko Kuroki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Candace Pahukula
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Susan Ichinose
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
June Ching
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Doreen Morinaga
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Ilene Samson
published 3
2.70
Lynette Furukawa
published 3
2.64
PJ Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Karen Griffon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.18
Susan Shingle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Monica McClelland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Shingle + Raelene Domingues7452% gamesnot enough data
Karen Griffon + Susan Ichinose1936% gamesnot enough data
Susan Shingle + PJ Ellison5546% gamesnot enough data
Raelene Domingues + Susan Ichinose8258% gamesnot enough data
Karen Griffon + Lynette Furukawa1539% gamesnot enough data
Riko Kuroki + Raelene Domingues5067% gamesnot enough data
Raelene Domingues + Lynette Furukawa4160% gamesnot enough data
PJ Ellison + Susan Ichinose224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Raelene Domingues
105W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Riko Kuroki
44W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Candace Pahukula
25W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Susan Ichinose
30W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
June Ching
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Doreen Morinaga
21W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Ilene Samson
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Lynette Furukawa
54W–72L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
PJ Ellison
45W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Karen Griffon
10W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Susan Shingle
40W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Monica McClelland
15W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.