Teams

Mergner - Team Lime

2024 Howard Circle D Adult 18 & Over Weekday · Howard Circle D Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-06-11vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 12
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta vs Stephanie Almeida / Kimberly Wells7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMary Shawhan vs Ashten Rea3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Karen Wynne vs Tonya Crosley / Peggy Koele4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-06vs Chaisson/DietzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslye Staub / Mary Shawhan vs Christine Pagendarm / Erica Loden3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Seyler / Lauren Kramer vs Julie Swartz / Mollie Crocker6-2, 6-1
2024-05-30vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Lauren Kramer vs Stephanie Almeida / Kimberly Wells3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-28vs Chaisson/DietzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Porta / Cecelia Biesecker vs Mary Jo Roberton / Sabrina Alban3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Seyler / Karen Hajj vs Eileen Dietz / Mollie Crocker6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-21vs Callahan/SteinbergSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta vs Christine Callahan / Quynh Tran6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Shawhan / Karen Wynne vs Leanne Glueck / Keri Teodori6-7, 2-6
2024-05-16vs Chaisson/DietzWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Karen Wynne vs Mary Jo Roberton / Christine Pagendarm6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Seyler / Lauren Kramer vs Eileen Dietz / Laura Haney6-2, 6-1
2024-05-09vs Callahan/SteinbergSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Porta / Cecelia Biesecker vs Beth Steinberg / Samantha Gass1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Shawhan / Catherine Hatfalvi vs Lynn Drucker / Ann Maiorana6-3, 6-0
2024-05-07vs Chaisson/DietzSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJacquelyn Berry / Karen Wynne vs Eileen Dietz / Julie Swartz4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKaren Seyler / Lauren Kramer vs Mollie Crocker / Janet Opar3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Callahan/SteinbergWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Porta / Cecelia Biesecker vs Keri Teodori / Leanne Glueck6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Shawhan vs Melissa Allnutt6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Wynne / Lorene Cannella vs Tricia Chancellor / Jodi Murray7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-25vs Chaisson/DietzWon 20
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta vs Sabrina Alban / Melissa Truffer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lynes / Mary Shawhan vs Jean Chaisson / Laura Haney6-2, 6-3
2024-04-18vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 02
L#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Catherine Wheeler vs Beth Steinberg / Quynh Tran2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Seyler / Karen Hajj vs Tricia Chancellor / Jodi Murray3-6, 4-6
2024-04-16vs Chaisson/DietzWon 30
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta vs Sabrina Alban / Melissa Truffer6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Shawhan vs Kathryn Broadbent6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Karen Wynne vs Laura Haney / Janet Opar6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Circle D Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Joy Oliver
published
3.73
Mary Shawhan
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Cecelia Biesecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Karen Wynne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Stephanie Porta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Elena Holford
published 3.5
3.37
Karen Seyler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Annika Mergner
published 3.5
Lauren Kramer
published
Sydney Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Porta + Cecelia Biesecker313249% games−4.2% vs expected
Karen Seyler + Cecelia Biesecker9449% gamesnot enough data
Mary Shawhan + Cecelia Biesecker7364% gamesnot enough data
Karen Seyler + Karen Wynne404 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Porta + Karen Seyler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Mary Shawhan
151W–114L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cecelia Biesecker
130W–122L career · 9 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Karen Wynne
20W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Stephanie Porta
56W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Elena Holford
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Karen Seyler
134W–121L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Annika Mergner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Kramer
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sydney Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.