Teams

Dominion Diablos

2025 COMBO · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-12vs Net navigatorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNitin Sharma / Daniel Trevino vs Jeff Henkes / Brian Chase6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlfredo Lozano / Oscar Garza vs Mahesh Kumar / Javi Fuentes7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDavid Mulligan / Michael Moran vs Prasad Achar / Kavan Mehta4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-11vs Just OutWon 21
W#1 DoublesLee Seidlits / David Mulligan vs Albert Zapata / Roque Juarez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRaul Ayarzagoitia / Jorge Riestra vs Joed Tague / Gabriel Gonzales6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElkin Echeverri / Andrew Taft vs Enrique Casas Jimenez / Byron Miller6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nitesh Jain
published
3.58
Lee Seidlits
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.56
Daniel Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.51
Elkin Echeverri
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Alfredo Lozano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Troy Gonzalez
published
3.41
Jorge Riestra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Raul Ayarzagoitia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
David Mulligan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Andrew Taft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Oscar Garza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raul Ayarzagoitia + Alfredo Lozano4450% games−3.3% vs expected
Oscar Garza + Alfredo Lozano224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Seidlits + Elkin Echeverri314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Trevino + Elkin Echeverri213 matchesnot enough data
Oscar Garza + Raul Ayarzagoitia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nitesh Jain
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Lee Seidlits
43W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Daniel Trevino
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
Elkin Echeverri
35W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Alfredo Lozano
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Troy Gonzalez
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jorge Riestra
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Raul Ayarzagoitia
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
David Mulligan
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Andrew Taft
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Oscar Garza
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.