Teams

Noto/18/5.5/Combo/WN/OCC

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night

18 players · average NTRP 2.86 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 8:00 PM
Broussard St Julien Park
Sep 21 6:00 PM
Oakbourne Country Club
Sep 28 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Hannah Noto
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Youngsville Sports Complex
2026-08-31vs Zhuo/18/5.5/Combo/WN/REDSWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllie Vermaelen / Katie Viator vs Marissa McBride / Fadoua yahia4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErin Breaux / Victoria Copeskey vs Kelly Robinson / Hayriye Gulbudak6-4, 3-0
W#3 DoublesHannah Noto / Allie Schexnayder vs Annie Ducote / Stacy Crochet7-5, 4-1
2026-08-24vs Pitre/18/5.5/Combo/WN/CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmelia Vining / Tonia Cormier vs Elizabeth Langley / Patti Broussard1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn LeBlanc / Victoria Copeskey vs Cathy Moore / Abby Pitre6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeanne Duhon / Chloe Reese vs Jennifer Coyle / Rachel Casanova6-2, 6-4
2026-08-17vs Proctor/18/5.5/Combo/WN/YSCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSolange Noriega / Aftan Guidry vs Katie Landry / Courtney Credeur2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChloe Reese / Kinley Hamilton vs Victoria Proctor / Kate Chaisson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Redd / Hannah Noto vs Kendall Gordon / Raven Hulin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 5.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dupre/18/5.5/Combo/WN/REDS1030012
2Olivier/18/5.5/Combo/WN/BSC1030121
3Dade/18/5.5/Combo/WN/YSC1021215
4Pitre/18/5.5/Combo/WN/CC1021222
5LeBlanc/18/5.5/Combo/WN/BSC1021318
6Noto/18/5.5/Combo/WN/OCC1021430
7Carmichael/18/5.5/Combo/WN/Reds000000
8McCullough/18/5.5/Combo/YSC000000
9Cormier/18/5.5/Combo/WN/BEVR0112429
10Proctor/18/5.5/Combo/WN/YSC0112422
11Girlinghouse/18/5.5/Combo/WN/BVR0112428
12Zhuo/18/5.5/Combo/WN/REDS0112531
13Broussard/18/5.5/Combo/WN/REDS0103635
14Daigle/18/5.5/Combo/WN/REDS0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Ann LeBlanc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Kinley Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Landry
published 3
2.69
Elise B Guidry
published
2.67
Amelia Vining
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Erin Breaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Allie Schexnayder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.55
Allie Vermaelen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Hannah Noto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Katie Viator
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Tonia Cormier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Aftan Guidry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chloe Reese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.04
Victoria Redd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.93
Solange Noriega
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jeanne Duhon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Breaux
published
Victoria Copeskey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tonia Cormier + Erin Breaux134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Breaux + Ann LeBlanc123 matchesnot enough data
Allie Schexnayder + Hannah Noto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann LeBlanc
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kinley Hamilton
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Amy Landry
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elise B Guidry
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Amelia Vining
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Erin Breaux
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
2.5
Allie Schexnayder
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
3
Allie Vermaelen
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Hannah Noto
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Katie Viator
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
Tonia Cormier
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
3
Aftan Guidry
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29
2.5
Chloe Reese
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Redd
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Solange Noriega
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Jeanne Duhon
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kathryn Breaux
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Copeskey
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.