Teams

GSTL 4.5W 18 & Over (Umpierrez)

2026 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCWon 41
L#1 DoublesKatie Rossabi / Nicole Harmon vs Rachel Berkey / Jolynn Prochaska2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Stanford vs Sarah LaPerle6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorna Stribos / Jenna McGary vs Katherine Quinney / Natalie Rogers6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Jessica Holmes6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Wood / Camilla Parker vs Marie Taylor / Denise Watts6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJenna McGary / Nikola Faust vs Rachel Berkey / Jolynn Prochaska5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Jessica Holmes6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Stanford / Sarah Wood vs Natalie Rogers / Kristin Boullion6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorna Stribos / Camilla Parker vs Sarah LaPerle / Laura Oljeski7-5, 6-2
2026-04-25vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesKatie Rossabi / Allison Stanford vs Natalie Rogers / Shital Patel6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Jessica Holmes6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicole Harmon / Tana Cornelius vs Nicole Pearce / Denise Watts6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNikola Faust / Camilla Parker vs Marie Taylor / Faith Langdale6-0, 6-4
2026-04-11vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJenna McGary / Erica Umpierrez vs Nicole Pearce / Jolynn Prochaska6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMelissa Griese vs Rachel Berkey0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTana Cornelius / Nicole Harmon vs Sarah LaPerle / Catherine Hill6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCamilla Parker / Nikola Faust vs Lexi Chlada / Marie Taylor3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCLost 13
W#1 DoublesJenna McGary / Nikola Faust vs Marie Taylor / Denise Watts6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Rachel Berkey0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Griese / Nicole Harmon vs Faith Langdale / Natalie Rogers5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCamilla Parker / Tana Cornelius vs Catherine Hill / Sarah LaPerle3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-14vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenna McGary / Nikola Faust vs Nicole Pearce / Faith Langdale6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLorna Stribos / Addison Flowers vs Natalie Rogers / Shital Patel6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Jessica Holmes6-0, 6-3
2026-02-28vs GSTL18/Holmes/RLTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesAddison Flowers / Yasmina Nigametzyanova vs Katherine Quinney / Marie Taylor6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesErica Umpierrez vs Jessica Holmes6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Stanford / Tana Cornelius vs Natalie Rogers / Nicole Pearce6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNikola Faust vs Sarah LaPerle6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Drosieko / Melissa Griese vs Faith Langdale / Laura Oljeski6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Addison Flowers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.45
Yasmina Nigametzyanova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Jenna McGary
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.15
Tana Cornelius
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Nicole Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Allison Stanford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Erica Umpierrez
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.87
Lorna Stribos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Carter Juergens
published 4
3.73
Nikola Faust
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Alice Puckett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Amanda Drosieko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Camilla Parker
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Melissa Griese
usually #3 Doubles 22%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Holly Cox
published
Katie Rossabi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camilla Parker + Erica Umpierrez4260% games+14.3% vs expected
Lorna Stribos + Holly Cox5163% games+11.5% vs expected
Nikola Faust + Jenna McGary7172% games+10.8% vs expected
Camilla Parker + Nikola Faust4170% gamesnot enough data
Erica Umpierrez + Jenna McGary404 matchesnot enough data
Allison Stanford + Holly Cox303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Addison Flowers
7W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Yasmina Nigametzyanova
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Jenna McGary
23W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Tana Cornelius
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Nicole Harmon
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
4.5
Allison Stanford
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.99
Erica Umpierrez
20W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Lorna Stribos
16W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Carter Juergens
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Nikola Faust
20W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Alice Puckett
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Amanda Drosieko
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Griese
16W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Holly Cox
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Rossabi
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.