Teams

Tarpon Coyotes

2026 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Sat (4 cts)

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-06vs PINELLAS/JordanLost 13
L#1 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Stella Maganiaris vs Michele Girardi / Valeska Dykes3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Amonrut Jaimoon2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeanne Matthews / Connie Williams vs Elizabeth Jordan / Erica Allums3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Laura Baker vs Beverly Bozarth / Carolyn Scondras3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-09vs Countryside Slice GirlsWon 31
L#1 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Dana Galbraith vs Debra Burwell / Frances Skinner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Tracia Danhour5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Baker / Michele Weinstock vs Brandy Martins / Griselda Taylor5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Connie Williams vs Colleen Bebell / Kathleen Lucey6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-30vs PINELLAS/FaraciLost 13
L#1 DoublesStella Maganiaris / Julie Kalter vs Isabelle Conti / Kerry Shanahan2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Kelley Richardsonn0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeanne Matthews / Patricia Calhoun vs Marti Pyle / Kristina Faraci6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Jennifer Soberal vs Joanna Johns / Connie Yilmaz6-1, 6-2
2026-04-25vs Innisbrook Net MagnoliasLost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Stella Maganiaris vs Lisa Connolly / Christie Rock1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeanne Matthews vs Patricia Aliak0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Jennifer Soberal vs Kristin Norcross / Melissa Bryan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Michele Weinstock vs Amie Rotz / Sandy Tottle4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Sat (4 cts) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Stella Maganiaris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Jennifer Soberal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Laura Baker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Patricia Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Dana Galbraith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Leanne Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.75
Julie Kalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Michele Weinstock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Betsy Rutkowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Connie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Michele Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Anne Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kalter + Anne Goodman4155% games+9.1% vs expected
Michele Sullivan + Jennifer Soberal3249% games+4.0% vs expected
Dana Galbraith + Betsy Rutkowski0633% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Calhoun + Stella Maganiaris224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kalter + Stella Maganiaris213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Calhoun + Dana Galbraith213 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Matthews + Connie Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Matthews + Michele Sullivan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stella Maganiaris
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jennifer Soberal
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Laura Baker
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Patricia Calhoun
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dana Galbraith
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Leanne Matthews
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Julie Kalter
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Michele Weinstock
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Betsy Rutkowski
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Connie Williams
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Michele Sullivan
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Anne Goodman
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.