Teams

Apex:Lob-Sters:Yang

2025 ME Fall Tri Level · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-07vs WOOD:GP70:CopseyLost 01
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Hardcastle / Liz Stokem vs Jane Camp / Nicole Gauthier2-6, 1-6
2025-11-15vs MP:MyrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarian Paull / Allie Yang-Green vs Kate Willeford / Erin James4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-01vs Apex:Tennistas:RogersLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Connor / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Lauren Schuman / Sarah Laduzenski1-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs Apex:TriSmashers:WangLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllie Yang-Green / Marian Paull vs Whitney Wignall / Wen Wang0-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Apex:HotPotatoes:BlairWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Clement / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Margaret Aitken / Erica Blair Reilly6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-19vs Apex:QuadSquad:CrosbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarian Paull / Susan O'Connor vs Jennifer Alcock / Ruth Crosby2-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs Apex:SeeYouInCourt:BazemoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Clement / Allie Yang-Green vs Anna-Marie DiPasquale / Regina Kieckhafer1-6, 4-6
2025-09-20vs Apex:BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarian Paull / Susan Clement vs Terri Febbraro / Margaret Eshleman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MP:Myrick8080247
2Apex:Tennistas:Rogers6262555
3Apex:QuadSquad:Crosby6262560
4Apex:TriSmashers:Wang4444870
5Apex:SeeYouInCourt:Bazemore4444971
6WOOD:GP70:Copsey35351072
7Apex:Lob-Sters:Yang26261385
8Apex:HotPotatoes:Blair08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Susan Clement
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Elisabeth Hardcastle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Marian Paull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Allie Yang-Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Liz Stokem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Hardcastle + Susan O'Connor314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Clement
35W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Elisabeth Hardcastle
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Marian Paull
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
2.5
Allie Yang-Green
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Liz Stokem
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan O'Connor
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.