Teams

MTS:Scharpf:Nippe

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-04-18vs GH:Winni'ngGirls:Joyce:ShegogWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Cathleen Scharpf vs Maureen Joyce / Betsy Chapin6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Jennifer Kelley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Saghir / Kimberly Valeri vs Julie Ciaraldi / Janet McDonough6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Donahue / Susan Johanson vs Nancy Tothill / Chelsea Crowder6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-21vs WV:Commandos:Brayton:McKinnonLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir vs Anne Marie Brayton / Stephanie Erb3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Peony Keve6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelsey Nippe / Debi Seamans vs Melissa Emery / Patty Furgal2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLois Nardo / Nancy Donahue vs Heather Byszewski / Barbara Bancroft6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Cathleen Scharpf vs Noel Correnti / Tammy Goldstein6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Saghir / Kimberly Valeri vs JOLENE JOHNSON / Sandra Jean6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Johanson / Debi Seamans vs Tamasine Wood-Creighton / Ann Dahlen2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir vs Barbara Wilson / Lorraine Acosta6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Jennifer Connors6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLois Nardo / Jennifer Abel vs Lynn Dolan / Sae-Im Smith3-6, 2-6
2023-02-07vs GH:Winni'ngGirls:Joyce:ShegogLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeidi Saghir / Kimberly Valeri vs Betsy Chapin / Maureen Joyce6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Heidi Bourgeois6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCathleen Scharpf / Nancy Donahue vs Janet McDonough / Jennifer Kelley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebi Seamans / Kelsey Nippe vs Martina Lord / Julie Ciaraldi3-6, 2-6
2023-01-10vs WV:Commandos:Brayton:McKinnonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir vs Anne Marie Brayton / Patty Furgal0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Peony Keve6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Johanson / Debi Seamans vs Margaret Roper / Melissa Emery6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Donahue / Cathleen Scharpf vs Thelma Koppel / Barbara Bancroft6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Nancy Pescinski vs Tammy Goldstein / Jessica Morris3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Susan Getman-Weissberg6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathleen Scharpf / Nancy Donahue vs Noel Correnti / Sandra Jean3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Marino / Pamela Vannah vs Kimberly Champoux / Laura Czerw7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Aimee Ayers vs Allegra Lubrano / Jen Gantrish6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Marino / Debi Seamans vs Sae-Im Smith / Aileen Chaltain4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Donahue / Cathleen Scharpf vs Beth Boyle / Judy Csatari6-1, 6-4
2022-11-22vs GH:Winni'ngGirls:Joyce:ShegogLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir vs Maureen Joyce / Betsy Chapin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Jennifer Kelley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLois Nardo / Elizabeth Kelly vs Barbara Shegog / Janet McDonough5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Marino / Debi Seamans vs Paula Spencer / Julie Ciaraldi1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-25vs WV:Commandos:Brayton:McKinnonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDebi Seamans / Debbie Marino vs Anne Marie Brayton / Stephanie Erb1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAimee Ayers vs Peony Keve6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCathleen Scharpf / Nancy Donahue vs Margaret Roper / Patty Furgal4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Vannah / Lois Nardo vs Thelma Koppel / Melissa Emery6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesHeidi Saghir / Kimberly Valeri vs Jessica Morris / Marcelle Murray6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathleen Scharpf / Nancy Donahue vs Tamasine Wood-Creighton / Tammy Goldstein2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Vannah / Kelsey Nippe vs Noel Correnti / Ann Dahlen5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valeri / Cathleen Scharpf vs Allegra Lubrano / Jen Gantrish2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebi Seamans / Nancy Pescinski vs Helen Ainsworth / Barbara Wilson2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLois Nardo / Kelsey Nippe vs Alison Gorman / Ann Waterfall6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HH:StormsAComing:Jubinville:Weisberg012301837391
2YMCA:JustKeepSwinging:Champoux:Johnson012321641396
3GH:Winni'ngGirls:Joyce:Shegog012301849414
4GB:Quinn:Rowe012242457427
5WV:Commandos:Brayton:McKinnon012192961466
6CON:Krushers:Rauseo012222662469
7RVC:GoodGollyMissVolley:Chaltain:Gorman012192963465
8MTS:Scharpf:Nippe012202864450
9WWCC:OdiornePoint:Cassidy012183068487
10WWCC:SagamoreCreek:Zimmerman:Porter012153369497
11GB:CenterCourtCrushers:Merida:Phillips01284085539

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Aimee Ayers
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.38
Heidi Saghir
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Cathleen Scharpf
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kimberly Valeri
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
3.15
Lois Nardo
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.09
Nancy Pescinski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Debi Seamans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.08
Susan Johanson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Pamela Vannah
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Debbie Marino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kelsey Nippe
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Donahue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Saghir + Cathleen Scharpf9556% games+10.3% vs expected
Kimberly Valeri + Heidi Saghir431660% games+4.6% vs expected
Lois Nardo + Pamela Vannah14658% games+3.0% vs expected
Pamela Vannah + Cathleen Scharpf10657% games+1.2% vs expected
Debi Seamans + Susan Johanson10454% games−0.3% vs expected
Kimberly Valeri + Cathleen Scharpf111448% games−0.6% vs expected
Cathleen Scharpf + Nancy Donahue4941% games−0.6% vs expected
Lois Nardo + Kelsey Nippe12952% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aimee Ayers
63W–33L career · 9 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.47
Heidi Saghir
70W–31L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Cathleen Scharpf
112W–81L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Kimberly Valeri
105W–67L career · 17 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Lois Nardo
85W–97L career · 16 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Nancy Pescinski
28W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Debi Seamans
45W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Susan Johanson
31W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Pamela Vannah
40W–29L career · 9 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Debbie Marino
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelsey Nippe
88W–66L career · 15 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Donahue
23W–37L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.