Teams

ACAC-Emery

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.61 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-19vs MAC-WhiteLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlicia Watkins / Ryan Bardaro vs Jeremy Calbreath / Debbie Messmer2-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs ACAC-LewisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Watkins / Ryan Bardaro vs Venkatachelam Regulagedda / Kristen Walton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-27vs CSW-MizrachWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Cumbie / Majd Babik vs Joni Albrecht / Ira Mogetz4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-29vs BURK-ShulerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarrell Eakes / Alicia Watkins vs Larry Shaia / Tricia Jones7-6, 5-3
2022-01-28vs ACAC-GhitaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMajd Babik / Andrea Cumbie vs Radu Siminiceanu / Denise Weisberg6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Alicia Watkins vs Andrei Fulga / Susan Lockhart6-4, 5-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Miguel Romero
published
3.86
Majd Babik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.82
Glenn Pfluger
published 4
3.74
Sonya Carman
published
3.72
Bert Teachey
published 4
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.38
Alicia Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Ryan Bardaro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Craig Carman
published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.12
Jennifer Flournoy
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Amy Romero
published 3
2.94
Ken Lowenstein
published
Julie Ruth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majd Babik + Jennifer Flournoy3351% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Romero + Amy Romero314 matchesnot enough data
Majd Babik + Alicia Watkins213 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Watkins + Ryan Bardaro123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miguel Romero
29W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Glenn Pfluger
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Sonya Carman
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Bert Teachey
119W–144L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Alicia Watkins
218W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Ryan Bardaro
177W–150L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Craig Carman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jennifer Flournoy
111W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Amy Romero
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Ken Lowenstein
18W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
Julie Ruth
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.