Teams

RFC:TBD:Woods

2022 ME Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-08vs RFC:TBD:DischLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Dealaman / Eric Driscoll vs Rogier Henny / Gregg Lipton1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Mercier vs Jason White1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephan Woods / Steven Richard vs Robert Disch / Ronald Chicoine3-6, 1-6
2022-06-08vs RFC:TBD:DischLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Mercier / Steven Richard vs Rogier Henny / Ronald Chicoine1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephan Woods vs Dmitry Bam0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Dealaman / Eric Driscoll vs Gregg Lipton / Jason White4-6, 4-6
2022-05-22vs RFC:TBD:DischLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Dealaman / Steven Mercier vs Owen Patrick / Jerry Lin5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Pickering / Eric Driscoll vs Eric Nixon / Todd Herrmann0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSteven Richard / Stephan Woods vs Jason White / Bert Cole1-6, 1-6
2022-05-22vs RFC:TBD:DischLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephan Woods / Jim Glanville vs Rogier Henny / Owen Patrick2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Richard vs Jason White1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Dealaman / Steven Mercier vs Robert Disch / Eric Nixon4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEric Driscoll / Richard Pickering vs Bert Cole / Todd Herrmann2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TBD:Disch40160052
2RFC:TBD:Woods0401632195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Steven Mercier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.85
Stephan Woods
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Richard Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
David Dealaman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Eric Driscoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jim Glanville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Richard
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Richard + Stephan Woods2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Mercier
63W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
Stephan Woods
55W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Richard Pickering
89W–48L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
David Dealaman
12W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Eric Driscoll
1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Glanville
46W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Steven Richard
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.