Teams

LATA40/FUNDERBURK/LCC

2023 Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 8.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-08vs LATA40/Kiser/SSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Jamie Gomez vs Melissa Brice / Craig Aull4-6, 1-6
2023-05-25vs LATA40/JWESCOTT/RCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Jamie Gomez vs Paula Howker Amick / Kemper Amick6-1, 6-4
2023-05-04vs LATA40/JWESCOTT/RCLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / Melissa Brightbill vs Ben Stitely / Amanda Willoughby3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-27vs LATA40/Kiser/SSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / Angie McCoy vs Lucas Berresford / Carey Wood1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Teri Grote
published
3.99
Melissa Brightbill
published
3.89
Brandon Doty
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Ely Grote
published 4
Jamie Gomez
published 4
3.74
Glen Funderburk
published 4
3.71
Miranda Heaberlin
published
3.67
Oliver Moore
published
3.63
Ashley Pender
published 4
3.56
Baxter Donaldson
published 4
3.50
Nathan Sanders
published
3.45
Farrah Schildknecht
published 3.5
3.31
Brian Heaberlin
published 3.5
3.29
Jan Bigg
published 3.5
3.26
Angie McCoy
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Oliver Moore + Ashley Pender033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Grote
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Melissa Brightbill
91W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Ely Grote
18W–29L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jamie Gomez
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Glen Funderburk
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Miranda Heaberlin
84W–28L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Oliver Moore
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ashley Pender
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Baxter Donaldson
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nathan Sanders
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Farrah Schildknecht
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Brian Heaberlin
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jan Bigg
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Angie McCoy
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.