Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+W(Missirian)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Erika Licon
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Alice Tutor
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.66
Angelica Ares
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
ALMA HERRERA
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Guadalupe Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Leila Lobato
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Natalia Castaneda
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Radel Farrah
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 19% · published
Veronica Perusquia
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+10.2% vs expected
Alice Tutor + Zulem Bordier7157% games+7.5% vs expected
Alice Tutor + Rosanna Missirian7154% games−1.7% vs expected
Rosanna Missirian + Erika Licon8953% games−6.3% vs expected
Cathey Jo Alberson + Radel Farrah9655% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Erika Licon9261% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Marisa Porras9160% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Herrera + Melissa Isaac3451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erika Licon
76W–61L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Alice Tutor
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Angelica Ares
65W–58L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
ALMA HERRERA
23W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Guadalupe Saenz
72W–59L career · 21 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
18W–8L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leila Lobato
65W–61L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–53L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–107L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Castaneda
39W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Radel Farrah
59W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
112W–86L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
45W–66L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Perusquia
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.