Teams

Dutchess Racquet Club: Senioritas

2025 55&Over Women · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-19vs DRC Wicked WinnersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Moise / Kelly Curran vs Kelly Maloney / Elizabeth Hammond3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Christina Bookless vs Niki Pagones / Carol Incledon6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElene Laiso / Jennifer Reap vs Sachiko Miller / Virginia Goldsmith6-2, 6-1
2025-08-14vs TotalWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiana Regini / Nita Ballantyne vs Melissa Mayes / Lucy Drotning4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Curran / Maria Moise vs Patricia Bradney / MaryAnne Erickson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Reap / Elene Laiso vs Michele Eldon / Kim Cantine6-1, 6-0
2025-08-05vs PTC: The HeatWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiana Regini / Elizabeth Fischer vs Dawn Tomassi / Maggie Tallman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Christina Bookless vs Carolynn Frankel / Cheryl Peruffo7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Pedziwiatr / Maria Moise vs Robin Myers / Marybeth Citera7-5, 6-3
2025-07-29vs TotalSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Regini / Elizabeth Fischer vs Patricia Bradney / Patricia Dempsey6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Pedziwiatr / Maria Moise vs Cynthia Lapp / Michele Eldon6-1, 6-3
2025-07-24vs PTC: The HeatLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Regini / Elizabeth Fischer vs Kari Rieser / Noreen Horodyski6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Bookless / Maria Moise vs Lori Bittker / Malvina Holloway5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Reap / Linda Paiva vs Elizabeth McGahay / Susan Kraus4-6, 1-6
2025-07-22vs DRC Wicked WinnersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Regini / Elizabeth Fischer vs Elizabeth Hammond / Carol Incledon6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Margaret Pedziwiatr vs Niki Pagones / Judy Godfrey6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina Bookless / Jennifer Reap vs Jennifer Green / Kathy McCabe6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dutchess Racquet Club: Senioritas0613513125
2PTC: The Heat0613515154
3Total0661227185
4DRC Wicked Winners0641430180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Elizabeth Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kelly Curran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Valerie Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Nita Ballantyne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Diana Regini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Erwin Watson
published
2.88
Christina Bookless
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Maria Moise
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Margaret Pedziwiatr
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Elene Laiso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Jennifer Reap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Linda Paiva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Reap + Christina Bookless6457% games+7.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Fischer + Valerie Barnes3254% games+6.7% vs expected
Christina Bookless + Elene Laiso5067% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Reap + Diana Regini421659% games+3.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Fischer + Diana Regini7262% games+2.4% vs expected
Valerie Barnes + Margaret Pedziwiatr9362% games+0.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Fischer + Margaret Pedziwiatr24758% games−0.1% vs expected
Kelly Curran + Diana Regini6355% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Fischer
157W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Kelly Curran
68W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Valerie Barnes
46W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.96
Nita Ballantyne
120W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Diana Regini
152W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Erwin Watson
36W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Christina Bookless
118W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Maria Moise
65W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Margaret Pedziwiatr
148W–123L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Elene Laiso
33W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Jennifer Reap
95W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Barbara Salvatoriello
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Linda Paiva
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.