Teams

Brewer

Combo · 6.5 Mens

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs PerrinLost 12
L#1 DoublesSimon Williams / Russell Weng vs Alexander Blake / Dan Odom2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Rowell / Adam Pardue vs James Perrin / Travis Funk1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick McLaurin / Thad Reid vs Colton Street / Dustin Baucom6-4, 6-1
2026-08-17vs PerrinLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick McLaurin / Thad Reid vs Alexander Blake / Travis Funk0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStanley Brewer / Russell Weng vs Bharat Kakarala / Dan Odom6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-10vs PerrinLost 12
L#1 DoublesStanley Brewer / Russell Weng vs Travis Funk / Alexander Blake4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Rowell / Adam Pardue vs Kerry Thompson / Dustin Baucom4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSimon Williams / Thad Reid vs Brandon Hamilton / James Perrin5-7, 6-7
2026-08-03vs PerrinLost 12
L#1 DoublesSimon Williams / Kelly Addington vs Travis Funk / Alexander Blake6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Rowell / Adam Pardue vs Dan Odom / Kerry Thompson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick McLaurin / Thad Reid vs James Perrin / Colton Street7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Mens have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Simon Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Stanley Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Patrick McLaurin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
David Rowell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Adam Pardue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Russell Weng
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Thad Reid
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Kelly Addington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stanley Brewer + Simon Williams8360% games+8.8% vs expected
David Rowell + Patrick McLaurin5552% games+3.6% vs expected
David Rowell + Adam Pardue123 matchesnot enough data
Thad Reid + Patrick McLaurin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Simon Williams
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Stanley Brewer
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Patrick McLaurin
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
David Rowell
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Adam Pardue
12W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Russell Weng
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Thad Reid
24W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kelly Addington
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.