Teams

EW-PC-Colclasure

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 MEN

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-19vs WCCP-FountainWon 31
W#1 DoublesLee Colclasure / Emerson Clark vs Jeff Fountain / Jason Ladum6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGordon Slysz vs Jacques Couture6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Hrebeniuk / Aaron Jorgensen vs Chris Ryan / Richard Splichal6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Crusselle / Steven McMurray vs Rahul Sharma / Gary Vaughn6-2, 6-1
2024-05-19vs PEAK-CattellWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Jones / Matthew Crusselle vs Kevin Tweed / Nelson Gourley6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJamie Carter vs Scott Anderson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAsif Malik / Larry Floyd vs Doug Conboy / Guy Schneider6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJim Perry / Scott Dowson vs John Williams / Gerald Spina6-3, 6-1
2024-05-18vs WCCP-FountainWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Dowson / Larry Floyd vs Jacques Couture / Chris Ryan6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAdam Hrebeniuk vs Jeff Fountain6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCory Brooks / Emerson Clark vs Rahul Sharma / Richard Splichal3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Carter / Aaron Jorgensen vs James Cramer / Gary Vaughn6-0, 6-1
2024-05-18vs YTC-KissMyDeGrasseWon 40
W#1 DoublesLee Colclasure / Jim Perry vs John Erb / Richard Lozano6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDavid Jones vs David Garent6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAsif Malik / Steven McMurray vs James Degrasse / Michael Rudick7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCory Brooks / Gordon Slysz vs David Barnett / Eric Anderson6-0, 6-3
2024-05-17vs YTC-KissMyDeGrasseWon 40
W#1 DoublesCory Brooks / Emerson Clark vs Dan Plath / David Garent7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Jones vs Richard Lozano6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Jorgensen / Adam Hrebeniuk vs Eric Anderson / Danny Mullins6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Crusselle / Steven McMurray vs James Degrasse / Michael Rudick6-4, 6-1
2024-05-17vs PEAK-CattellSplit 22
L#1 DoublesScott Dowson / Jim Perry vs Kevin Tweed / John Williams6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGordon Slysz vs Nelson Gourley4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAsif Malik / Larry Floyd vs Doug Conboy / Guy Schneider6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLee Colclasure / Jamie Carter vs Jeff Woodie / John Cattell3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Scott Dowson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Adam Hrebeniuk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.84
Larry Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Asif Malik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Gordon Slysz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Matthew Crusselle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Steven McMurray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Emerson Clark
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Cory Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Aaron Jorgensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Jim Perry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
David Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jamie Carter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lee Colclasure
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Hrebeniuk + Asif Malik3264% games+14.8% vs expected
Emerson Clark + David Jones10360% games+10.3% vs expected
Matthew Crusselle + David Jones5161% games+8.2% vs expected
Cory Brooks + Emerson Clark7260% games+5.1% vs expected
Asif Malik + Larry Floyd9356% games+4.2% vs expected
Jim Perry + Scott Dowson351360% games+3.4% vs expected
Matthew Crusselle + Steven McMurray6162% games+0.6% vs expected
Cory Brooks + Aaron Jorgensen4548% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Scott Dowson
111W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Adam Hrebeniuk
87W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Larry Floyd
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Asif Malik
74W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Gordon Slysz
31W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Matthew Crusselle
57W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Steven McMurray
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Emerson Clark
71W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Cory Brooks
66W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Aaron Jorgensen
57W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Jim Perry
90W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
David Jones
88W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jamie Carter
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Colclasure
32W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.