Teams

EMerritt

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-28vs IPCochranWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Uthe / Rebecca Hancock vs Kim Hopkins / Jennifer Mitchell6-2, 6-2
2022-09-21vs KHuffstetler 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Coyne / Alison Uthe vs Amanda Bauer / Pamela Pitre7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-07vs Kopp/SmithLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Brewer / Elizabeth Merritt vs Ilsy Chappell / Jeanie White6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-31vs KTownsend/LRoss (40+ 6.5)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Brewer / Ashley Gaylord vs Dianna Erwin / Christine Burr7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Brewer / Julie Coyne vs Julie Brigham / Lynelle Clark6-3, 6-1
2022-08-30vs ICShaw/LyleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Brewer / Julie Coyne vs Elizabeth Lyle / Karen Gupton7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Gaylord / Alison Uthe vs Shelly Rogers / Liz Woodall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-23vs YBarrow40+ 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Gaylord / Adrienne Brewer vs Kelly Burkhardt / Ashley Kerr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-17vs SBowersWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Brewer / Ramsay Younger vs Laura Bell / Erica Rankin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Gaylord / Alison Uthe vs Gayle Porter / Joy Cooper6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Heather Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Adrienne Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.46
Alison Uthe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Gaylord
published 3.5
3.22
Julie Coyne
published
3.04
Libby Stubbs
published
3.02
Ramsay Younger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Brewer + Adrienne Brewer343950% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Brewer
112W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Adrienne Brewer
87W–97L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Alison Uthe
76W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ashley Gaylord
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Julie Coyne
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Libby Stubbs
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
Ramsay Younger
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.