← Teams

VTC-Darling/Kjos

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.12
Deborah Self
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
2.99
Maryann Velez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Amy Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.50
Phyllis Ghazi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Heidi Palena vs Maya Mori / Jennifer Johnson6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDeborah Self vs Teufelin Traylen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Amy Hicks vs Sarah Larson / Tiffany Bowie6-3, 6-3
2023-06-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Heidi Kjos vs Michelle Cortez / Rachel Ritchie7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Maryann Velez vs Philberta Leung / Gwen Kulak6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Robin Burak vs Barbara Lolich / Pamela Meyer6-3, 6-0
2023-05-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Amy Hicks vs Vanessa Gallant / Kerry Forsell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaryann Velez / Alana Rhea vs Jacqueline Babb Milligan / Denise Westby6-4, 6-0
2023-05-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Heidi Kjos vs Lucia Parker / Kelley Malama6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Self / Maryann Velez vs Sima Desai / Dana Nolan7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina Parks / Amy Hicks vs Molly Littlejohn / Cory Sebastian6-4, 6-2
2023-05-07Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMaryann Velez / Deborah Self vs Ashley Sajadi / Karla Hendrickson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlana Rhea / Christina Parks vs Nina Church-Adams / Carmen Timberlake6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrish Carder / Amy Hicks vs Robyn Aoyagi / Denise Visse6-4, 6-1
2023-04-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Heidi Kjos vs Emily Shields / Jacquelyn Miller3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlana Rhea / Deborah Self vs Shelly Bigley / Barbara Gram6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Maryann Velez vs Grayson Dempsey / Elizabeth Ayotte6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Heidi Kjos vs Alena Lauritsen / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Amy Hicks vs Barbara Dusicka / Lauren Mang6-2, 6-1
2023-04-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Alana Rhea vs Diana Crawford / Lisa McConachie6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDeborah Self vs Melissa Tom6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBridget Raach / Phyllis Ghazi vs Janet Hummel / JEAN CHEN6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
Maryann Velez
81W–49L career
0%83%17%
2.99
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Amy Hicks
57W–67L career
2%98%0%
2.71
3
Phyllis Ghazi
19W–52L career · type A
34%66%0%
2.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.