Teams

Triple Trouble

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-10-09vs The Boo CrewLost 01
L#3 DoublesZilya Ruga / Tricia Lolkus vs Renee DiVincent / Nympha Sison6-7, 2-6
2022-10-08vs Seminole Triple the FunLost 01
L#3 DoublesGail Stallwood / Zilya Ruga vs Moise Carrington / Beverly Bozarth7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
4.14
Olivia Rivas
published
3.87
Amy Brooks
published 4
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.50
Tricia Lolkus
published 3.5
3.48
3.29
Gail Stallwood
published 3.5
3.01
Zilya Ruga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Hueholt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Guerra + Amy Brooks4356% games−1.3% vs expected
Tricia Lolkus + Amy Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
4.37
Olivia Rivas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Amy Brooks
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Tricia Lolkus
98W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
Victoria Romero Lara
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Gail Stallwood
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Zilya Ruga
42W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lisa Hueholt
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.