Teams

Brookfield (Dana Long)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.0 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-17vs White Columns (Andrea Gordon)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Beam / Heather Butler vs Suzie Drummond / Pamela Fabianski6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMickey Karoly / Jacqueline Morin vs Mary Beth DuFour / Stephanie Mueller6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDana Long / Katy Vogel vs Kelly Cravens / Jacqueline Wilson4-6, 3-6
2026-03-10vs CC of Roswell (Erin Norcia)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Beam / Heather Butler vs Donna Beatty / Sandra Lashley3-6, 7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Legg / Katy Vogel vs Jennifer Knapp / Heather Cannon3-6, 6-3, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaulie Hamling / Jacqueline Morin vs Erin Norcia / Maggie Pitts4-6, 6-4, 1-6
2026-03-03vs Horseshoe Bend (Heidi Mulling)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesMaryellen Bishop / Angela Duggan vs Saundra Maxwell / Rachel Rawson6-4, 5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMickey Karoly / Jacqueline Morin vs Kristin Gotham / Melissa Crean6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Katy Vogel vs Kathleen Batke / Angie Hitch6-2, 6-4
2026-02-24vs White Columns (Andrea Gordon)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Smith / Summer Lindvig vs Kerri Eskin / Karin Warden1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Butler / Mickey Karoly vs Mary Beth DuFour / Susie Uhlich6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDana Long / Caulie Hamling vs Kelly Cravens / Jenni Talbert6-2, 7-6
2026-02-17vs CC of Roswell (Erin Norcia)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Butler / Maryellen Bishop vs Erin Norcia / Maggie Pitts6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Duggan / Jacqueline Morin vs Christy Sniecinski / Swati Patel6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Legg / Katy Vogel vs ANGELICA GOLDBERG / Sharon Waymire4-6, 4-6
2026-02-10vs Horseshoe Bend (Heidi Mulling)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Butler / Jacqueline Morin vs Saundra Maxwell / Rachel Rawson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMickey Karoly / Jennifer Smith vs Alison Bounds / Grace Cleary6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaty Vogel / Dana Long vs Melissa Crean / Edita Tracey6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC of Roswell (Erin Norcia)*5114413145
2Brookfield (Dana Long)*5111715161
3Burdette TC (Melissa Hayes)*5112616156
4Park Brooke (Lisa Harding)*4213513131
5USTA Atlanta/Robin Patterson4212614138
6USTA Atlanta/Lisa Johnson4212615157
7Overlook (Shelly Owens)*3310820189
8White Columns (Andrea Gordon)*2461224191
9Three Chimneys (Nicole Martin)*2461225197
10St. Marlo (Hetal Banerjee)*2481026200
11Horseshoe Bend (Heidi Mulling)*0651328204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Angela Duggan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Heather Butler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Katie Beam
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Mickey Karoly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Maryellen Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Jacqueline Morin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Dana Long
published 3
2.69
Laura Legg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Summer Lindvig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Katy Vogel
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.51
Caulie Hamling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickey Karoly + Jacqueline Morin303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Legg + Katy Vogel033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Legg + Katie Beam213 matchesnot enough data
Maryellen Bishop + Angela Duggan213 matchesnot enough data
Katy Vogel + Caulie Hamling213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Butler + Katie Beam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Duggan
27W–14L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Heather Butler
20W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Katie Beam
30W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mickey Karoly
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Maryellen Bishop
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jacqueline Morin
25W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dana Long
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Legg
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Summer Lindvig
15W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Katy Vogel
13W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Caulie Hamling
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.