Teams

GreyHawk -

2021 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 Mixed Winter

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-06vs Riverstone 2 - C. MarchandLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Shane Lefebvre / Christina Clontz2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Charles Mills vs Charles Klass / Sara Wachs1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Joe Lopez / Suzanne McAllister2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Reichel / Michelle Maggal vs Heather Christie / Paul Christie3-6, 2-6
2021-02-13vs Naples Grande - L. LaveryWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Timothy Buelow / Barbara Dovin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / James Moore vs John Healy / Kathy Healy7-5, 7-5
2021-02-07vs Pelican Bay North - RuffoloLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Neal Lewis / Jocelyn Badiu2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / John Reichel vs Mike Ruffolo / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi4-6, 2-6
2021-01-30vs Marco YMCA - J.CarleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Renee Facciola / Roberto Pericoli6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / John Reichel vs Julie Carley / Patrick Huey6-1, 6-0
2021-01-23vs Bay Colony - TarantinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Dan Curry vs Richard Tarantino / Minde Shinnick3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / John Reichel vs Rita Hawaux / Paul Pettenaro3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-01-16vs Pelican Marsh - O. FerrerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Curry / Dina Viteretti vs Cheryl Solimine / Lawrence Jeremias6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-01-09vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 20
W#1 DoublesDina Viteretti / Dan Curry vs Karen Huffman / Elvin Vargas6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / James Moore vs Sara Mcguinn / Carmelo Rubio6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Dan Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.41
Dina Viteretti
published 3.5
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Linda Orlich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Curry + Donna Curry7557% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Curry
111W–39L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Dina Viteretti
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Orlich
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.