Teams

DTP YELLOW

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-13vs WP GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Bartels / John Blue vs Kim Chen / Wayne Mitchel7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs WP SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Bartels / Jose Amador vs Diana Rael / Jake Hugenberg7-5, 6-4
2023-07-23vs APR-E YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesVictoria Keller / Jose Amador vs Angie Shappell / Nabeel Meghji3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-07-09vs CP ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Bartels / Jose Amador vs Victoria Bull / Juan Bossano6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Gretchen Wilder
published
4.60
Diana Solanki
published 5
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.19
Alberto Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.16
Nicholas Hoelmer
published
4.16
John Blue
published
3.95
Jennifer Armstrong
published
3.95
Linda Bartels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Mia Settlemire
published 4
3.57
Lawrence McGaughy
published
3.55
Rob Mullins
published
Yuhei Kasetani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Amador + Linda Bartels7259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gretchen Wilder
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Diana Solanki
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Alberto Gutierrez
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Nicholas Hoelmer
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
John Blue
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Jennifer Armstrong
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Linda Bartels
200W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Mia Settlemire
64W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lawrence McGaughy
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
Rob Mullins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.55
Yuhei Kasetani
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.