Teams

Bose - Honey Deuce

2026 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dentoni - Wildcats000000
2Bose - Honey Deuce000000
3Farrington - break a string 6.5 18+000000
4Sharma - ACE ACE BABY MOCO 6.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Kara Stegeman
published 3
3.11
Prashila Dullabh
published 3
3.08
Stacey White
published
2.98
Tosha Clark
published
2.97
Tracie Hill
published
2.95
Kyung Haw Sung
published 3
2.91
Karen Cheeks
published 3
2.85
Alison Smith
published 3
2.85
Jonaki Bose
published
2.84
Jennifer Spence
published
2.77
Grace Wei
published
2.74
Rona Birnbaum
published
2.73
Jennifer Donaghue
published
2.72
Helen Chao
published
2.60
Jocelyn McDaniel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jocelyn McDaniel + Helen Chao3258% games+1.6% vs expected
Jonaki Bose + Jennifer Spence123 matchesnot enough data
Jonaki Bose + Kyung Haw Sung303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey White + Kara Stegeman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kara Stegeman
81W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3
Prashila Dullabh
91W–60L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Stacey White
17W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Tosha Clark
54W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Tracie Hill
43W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Kyung Haw Sung
52W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Karen Cheeks
66W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Alison Smith
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Jonaki Bose
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Jennifer Spence
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Grace Wei
29W–21L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jennifer Donaghue
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Helen Chao
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Jocelyn McDaniel
47W–24L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.