Teams

TTC-Timberhill

2023 ADULT 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-03vs ESTC-YangSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDrew Gerkey / AJ Millet vs Edmund Yang / Jon Eschrich6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristopher Holland vs Robert Chandler0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRoss Ruecker / Mark Szabo vs Kevin Quah / Jonathan Gonenne3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiguel Angel Trejo Romo / Thomas Iverson vs Joel Bartlett / John Smiddy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-21vs S OR-ACB-AndersonLost 14
W#1 DoublesDrew Gerkey / Jon Hattenhauer vs Garrett Kaye / Corey Weathers6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristopher Holland vs Tucker Page1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Lin / AJ Millet vs Travis Anderson / Robb Schotthoefer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSevern Williams vs Kenyon Neuman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoss Ruecker / Mark Szabo vs Mark Leckband / Steve Lindsay2-6, 4-6
2023-05-07vs S OR-ACB-AndersonWon 32
W#1 DoublesAJ Millet / Jason Lin vs Robb Schotthoefer / Kitt Hawkins6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDrew Gerkey vs Luke Habig - (DQ)*0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Szabo / Ross Ruecker vs Mark Leckband / Tucker Page6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristopher Holland vs Daniel Emerson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiguel Angel Trejo Romo / Thomas Iverson vs Corey Weathers / Kenyon Neuman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-06vs S OR-ACB-AndersonLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristopher Holland / Jason Lin vs Daniel Emerson / Mark Leckband4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDrew Gerkey vs Luke Habig - (DQ)*1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Szabo / Ross Ruecker vs Robb Schotthoefer / Travis Anderson3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAJ Millet vs Kenyon Neuman6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMiguel Angel Trejo Romo / Thomas Iverson vs Corey Weathers / Kitt Hawkins3-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs ESTC-YangWon 41
W#1 DoublesDrew Gerkey / Jason Lin vs Edmund Yang / John Smiddy6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJon Hattenhauer vs Robert Chandler6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRoss Ruecker / Mark Szabo vs Aaron Kenny / Curtis Bineham6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSevern Williams vs Kamal Gill4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiguel Angel Trejo Romo / Thomas Iverson vs Christopher Casey / Joel Bartlett6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-08vs ESTC-YangWon 41
W#1 DoublesAJ Millet / Jason Lin vs Edmund Yang / Greg OHanlon6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJon Hattenhauer vs Jonathan Gonenne4-1
L#2 DoublesMark Szabo / Ross Ruecker vs Christopher Casey / John Smiddy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSevern Williams vs Jon Eschrich6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesThomas Iverson / Miguel Angel Trejo Romo vs Kevin Quah / Joel Bartlett7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ACB-Anderson51191129275
2TTC-Timberhill33171332259
3ESTC-Yang1592147312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
AJ Millet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.87
Thomas Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.84
Drew Gerkey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Jason Lin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Ross Ruecker
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.47
Mark Szabo
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jon Hattenhauer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kristopher Holland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Miguel Angel Trejo Romo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Severn Williams
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Drew Gerkey + AJ Millet6066% games+11.7% vs expected
AJ Millet + Jason Lin5358% games+7.0% vs expected
Miguel Angel Trejo Romo + Thomas Iverson4555% games+6.8% vs expected
Mark Szabo + Thomas Iverson4356% games−1.5% vs expected
Mark Szabo + Ross Ruecker6453% games−4.1% vs expected
Drew Gerkey + Ross Ruecker2543% games−9.8% vs expected
Drew Gerkey + Jason Lin314 matchesnot enough data
AJ Millet + Ross Ruecker314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AJ Millet
22W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
Thomas Iverson
38W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Drew Gerkey
27W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Jason Lin
18W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Ross Ruecker
36W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.78
3.5
Mark Szabo
15W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jon Hattenhauer
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristopher Holland
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Angel Trejo Romo
17W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Severn Williams
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.