Teams

Shenk - The Lady Aces

2025 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-10vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Libonate / Cassie Hintermister vs Melissa Walker / Marta Maksymiuk5-7, 1-6
2025-04-05vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Shaffner / Erica Murray vs Naresha Moore / Jillian Zoltek0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-03vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristi Lightse / Cassie Hintermister vs Melissa Walker / Heather Henderson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Shaffner vs Jillian Zoltek2-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Marshall / Michelle Shaffner vs Marta Maksymiuk / Naresha Moore6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Shaffner / Erica Murray vs Jillian Zoltek / Maritza Dotti6-3, 6-1
2025-03-22vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Libonate / Mamata Mukkara vs Heather Henderson / Naresha Moore1-6, 2-6
2025-03-20vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ Courtney Walder / Michelle Shaffner vs Heather Henderson / Maritza Dotti6-4, 6-2
2025-03-15vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Libonate / Lisa Marshall vs Mercedes Lemp / Melissa Walker6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-13vs Moore - Drop Shot DivasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Libonate / Michelle Shaffner vs Naresha Moore / Melissa Walker6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Gail Shenk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Mugdha Samant
published
2.59
Michelle Shaffner
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.48
Shannon Lebo
published
2.45
Karen Libonate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.42
Kristi Lightse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Melissa Conner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Libonate + Gail Shenk134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Libonate + Michelle Shaffner404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gail Shenk
131W–119L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Mugdha Samant
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Michelle Shaffner
33W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Shannon Lebo
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Karen Libonate
52W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Kristi Lightse
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Melissa Conner
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.