Teams

Federer Was Betterer

2025 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-12-06vs Kelly/StohrSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTomas Reese / Anish Katam vs John Miller / Darren Stohr4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Luong / Nathan Allen vs Patrick Kelly / Neeraj Buch7-5, 6-1
2025-11-23vs Smash BrosLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Mariano / William Britton vs Dennis Vanill / Jim Lancer6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnish Katam / Christopher Cameron vs Ashley Chung / Daniel Medina3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Samuels / Alan Grossfield vs David Vega / Aarne Lees1-6, 4-6
2025-11-08vs BuppSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Tomas Reese vs Chris Bailey / Manuel Castillo6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnish Katam / Alex Casale vs Chris Crockett / Michael Bupp4-6, 6-7
2025-11-01vs ROC: ServedLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsaac Wu / Chris Mariano vs Spencer Ekola / James Green4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRajesh Barnabas / William Britton vs Eugene Kobyakov / Jeffrey Tankel1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEric Samuels / Andrew Kita vs Chad Heatwole / Joseph McClaney6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-25vs Kelly/StohrWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsaac Wu / Chris Mariano vs Anirban Bose / Patrick Kelly4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharlie Swanson / Rajesh Barnabas vs Darren Stohr / Terry Krocke7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Alex Casale vs Rhett Sullivan / David Marshall2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-19vs Smash BrosLost 12
W#1 DoublesTyler Luong / Tomas Reese vs Ashley Chung / Gilbert Collins7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Allen / Christopher Cameron vs Dennis Vanill / Daniel Medina4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlexander Detwiler / Andrew Kita vs Jackson Tran / Aarne Lees0-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs BuppWon 21
W#1 DoublesTomas Reese / Stephen Heinzelman vs Chris Bailey / JJ Jackson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTyler Luong / Christopher Cameron vs Michael Bupp / Stephen Repass6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEric Hetzke / Eric Samuels vs Nick Hunter / Rudolph Pugliese6-2, 6-0
2025-09-27vs ROC: ServedLost 12
L#1 DoublesTomas Reese / Isaac Wu vs Spencer Ekola / Patrick Clark2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVimal Seshadri Raguraman / Stephen Heinzelman vs Eugene Kobyakov / Jeffrey Tankel6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Casale / Andrew Kita vs Keith Stanley / Trevor Ritchie6-3, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Kelly/StohrWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Ashley Chung vs Darren Stohr / Kyle Sherry6-2, 6-2
2025-03-30vs BuppWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Ashley Chung vs Gregg Hartvigsen / Chris Bailey6-3, 6-4
2025-03-09vs BuppWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Aarne Lees vs Stephen Repass / William Spencer6-0, 6-4
2025-02-23vs Empire TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Gilbert Collins vs Jonel Whitcomb / Matt Nespoli6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Served7118614153
2Federer Was Betterer35121227216
3Kelly/Stohr3571735226
4Bupp0861837263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Chris Mariano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Tomas Reese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Tyler Luong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Isaac Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Andrew Kita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.74
Charlie Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Alan Grossfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.70
Christopher Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Alex Casale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Eric Hetzke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Allen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Rajesh Barnabas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Heinzelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajesh Barnabas + Christopher Cameron224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Hetzke + Alex Casale314 matchesnot enough data
Tomas Reese + Tyler Luong404 matchesnot enough data
Rajesh Barnabas + Charlie Swanson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Mariano
48W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Tomas Reese
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Tyler Luong
20W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Isaac Wu
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
3.5
Andrew Kita
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Charlie Swanson
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
3.5
Alan Grossfield
24W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Christopher Cameron
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Alex Casale
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Eric Hetzke
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Allen
34W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rajesh Barnabas
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Heinzelman
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.