Teams

An.Acharya18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-29vs He.Suke18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeghan Campbell vs Ashley Randall0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnuja Acharya vs Geri Russell0-6, 0-5
L#3 SinglesCristina Baker vs Heidi Suke2-6, 1-6
2025-07-28vs Ja.Stephan18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Rebekah Noulles7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-30vs Em.Andino18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Sumathi Sundaram6-1, 6-3
2025-06-23vs Me.McCaskill18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesHollyanne Compton vs Austin Coley3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMeghan Campbell vs CarolAnn Wiggs2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesPamela Stephens vs Lexie Batchelor4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-16vs Me.Dougher18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesHollyanne Compton vs Ana Marshall5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMeghan Campbell vs Amy Willard7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesPamela Stephens vs Amy Whitaker2-6, 1-6
2025-06-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Shamarrah Broadus7-6, 6-2
2025-06-02vs Je.Tyndall18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesLauren Kane vs ROBIN STEWART4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEmilie Moses vs Heather Russell6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHollyanne Compton vs Sarah Ammirati6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Emilie Moses
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Meghan Campbell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.43
Khelsey Lemon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Pamela Stephens
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Lauren Kane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Hollyanne Compton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Kristina Faulkner
published
2.20
Cristina Baker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
1.83
Anuja Acharya
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Kane + Emilie Moses3354% games+8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emilie Moses
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Meghan Campbell
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Khelsey Lemon
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
Pamela Stephens
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Hollyanne Compton
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Kristina Faulkner
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Cristina Baker
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Anuja Acharya
1W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.