Teams

CBRC-Mehlenbacher

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-08vs EW-WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Mark Taylor6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Coles / Paula Davis-Vedder vs Donna Parsons / Michael Bendtsen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Kathy Mehlenbacher vs ANNA MILNER / Bryan Noyd3-1
2023-07-07vs EW-WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesBryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher vs Ellen Lester / Michael Bendtsen5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Smoot / Kent Ozkardesh vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder vs ANNA MILNER / Richard Lester6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-07vs EW-WRAC-NoydLost 12
W#1 DoublesKent Ozkardesh / Victoria Smoot vs ANNA MILNER / Richard Lester6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher vs Donna Parsons / Brad Bartol3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang vs Ellen Lester / Michael Bendtsen4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WRAC-Noyd3063879
2CBRC-Mehlenbacher03361388

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Paula Davis-Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Bryan Coles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Victoria Smoot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Huijuan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Mehlenbacher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kent Ozkardesh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Samuel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Davis-Vedder + Evan Mehlenbacher9452% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Coles + Kathy Mehlenbacher5552% gamesnot enough data
Todd Samuel + Huijuan Zhang2351% gamesnot enough data
Evan Mehlenbacher + Kathy Mehlenbacher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paula Davis-Vedder
54W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Bryan Coles
38W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Victoria Smoot
70W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Huijuan Zhang
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Mehlenbacher
22W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kent Ozkardesh
42W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Todd Samuel
84W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.