Teams

Ma.Riddick18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-22vs Sa.Highsmith18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Kelly Coble vs Tacey Hesmer / Betsy Carr2-6, 1-6
2023-09-12vs Ca.Schuch18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Meagan Heath vs Jessica Swaney / Katharine Merritt6-2, 6-2
2023-09-08vs Je.Jones18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Claire See vs Andrea Overfield / Lauren Daigle5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-01vs Da.Rusnak18C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Marciny Trice vs Heather Word / Brittany Shumaker6-1, 6-1
2023-08-23vs Sh.Marconi18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Meagan Heath vs Taryn Backus / Katelyn Steadman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Adria McGlamery
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Thea McNeill
published
2.65
Ashley Poston
published 3
2.62
Meagan Heath
published
2.44
Amanda Falsone
published 3
2.38
2.02
Claire See
published 2.5
Marciny Trice
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adria McGlamery
54W–33L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Thea McNeill
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Ashley Poston
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Meagan Heath
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Amanda Falsone
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
MaryAdelaide Riddick
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Claire See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Marciny Trice
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.