Teams

Nguyen, Tam

2025 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs Pullen, JacksonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBryton Hixson / Phillip Pace vs Collin Kozielski / Matt Carpenter6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Foley / Brice Till vs Riley Bennett / Jackson Pullen4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRehan Ali / Sourav Dutta vs Lance Miller / Tyler Mcintyre6-3, 6-4
2025-10-01vs Walker, NivenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Griffin / Matthew Gordon vs Jackson Ikerd / Brennan Miller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBryton Hixson / Phillip Pace vs Andrew Stubbs / Bryan Howell0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJason McKnatt / Rehan Ali vs Andrew Haile / Kellon Lawrence7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-17vs Custode, HectorLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Foley / Sourav Dutta vs Tan Do / Paige Purvis2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJason McKnatt / Bryton Hixson vs Hector Custode / John Patton1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Hitt / Steven Cialone vs Tim Davis / Reuben Harvey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-10vs Bailey, BenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Griffin / Bryton Hixson vs Elkin Crews / Brandon Norton6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Foley / Phillip Pace vs Nick Morgan / JD Hosemann3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Rehan Ali vs Beau Brady / Stephen Langley6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-03vs Pullen, JacksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Griffin / Matthew Gordon vs Riley Bennett / Lance Miller6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrey Isbell / Bryton Hixson vs Travis Donald / Chase Atkinson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Hitt / Steven Cialone vs Christian Medina / Robert Williams6-3, 6-2
2025-08-27vs Walker, NivenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason McKnatt / Brice Till vs Lane Clower / Adam Byrd1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Foley / Sourav Dutta vs Andrew Haile / Will Russell Ward4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRehan Ali / Tam Nguyen vs Jeffrey Carmody / Bryce Ishee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-13vs Custode, HectorLost 12
L#1 DoublesSourav Dutta / Steven Cialone vs Tan Do / Paige Purvis3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJason McKnatt / Rehan Ali vs Hector Custode / John Patton3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBryton Hixson / Matthew Gordon vs Tim Davis / Reuben Harvey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-06vs Bailey, BenLost 12
L#1 DoublesSourav Dutta / Trey Isbell vs Charles Bailey / Elkin Crews3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Foley / Bryton Hixson vs Chandler Strain / Randy Tuggle4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Gordon / Joseph Hitt vs David Adams / Stephen Langley7-6, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Custode, Hector7118613155
2Nguyen, Tam35111332245
3Pullen, Jackson1722244272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Jason McKnatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Steven Cialone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Matthew Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Bryton Hixson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
Michael Foley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Rehan Ali
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brice Till
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Sourav Dutta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Phillip Pace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jason Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Hitt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Trey Isbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sourav Dutta + Rehan Ali7452% games+8.3% vs expected
Jason McKnatt + Brice Till044 matchesnot enough data
Jason McKnatt + Rehan Ali123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason McKnatt
19W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Steven Cialone
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Matthew Gordon
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Bryton Hixson
46W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Michael Foley
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Rehan Ali
32W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Brice Till
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sourav Dutta
30W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Phillip Pace
69W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Jason Griffin
43W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Hitt
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trey Isbell
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.