Teams

Blakemore - Tie Breakers

2026 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-22vs Gomez - Smash & DashLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachael Day / Edward Busse vs Amilcar Gomez / Seungyeon Kim4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Ochsenknecht / Barry Clark vs Susan Button / Juan Vargas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLenny Peters / Jamie Mcneill vs Dylan Galenski / Tara Ford4-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Gomez - Smash & DashLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarry Clark / Rachael Day vs Dylan Galenski / Kathryn Davis3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEdward Busse / Jamie Mcneill vs Juan Vargas / Seungyeon Kim0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLenny Peters / Emily Ochsenknecht vs Amilcar Gomez / Tara Ford0-6, 0-6
2026-03-15vs Nankivel - TNT 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Mozena / Jamie Mcneill vs Jason Gordon / Kristina Smithson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEdward Busse / Karen Franklin vs Joseph Yoshimura / Keyona Bell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarry Clark / Linda Blakemore vs Jaecheon Yoo / Emily Sereno3-6, 2-6
2026-03-07vs Nankivel - TNT 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarry Clark / Linda Blakemore vs William George / Dorota Sipko2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEdward Busse / Rachael Day vs Jaecheon Yoo / Emily Sereno2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCharles Hyde / Karen Franklin vs Jason Gordon / Judith Jobrack1-6, 3-6
2026-03-01vs Hunter - Stranger SwingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSophia Constantine / Barry Clark vs Kaitlyn Hunter / Lawrence Hunter6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEdward Busse / Rachael Day vs Luke Sweeney / Ashley Hudgins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJamie Mcneill / Charles Hyde vs Vivian Hunter / Jahrome Fletcher7-5, 6-3
2026-02-19vs Gomez - Smash & DashSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarry Clark / Linda Blakemore vs Maurice Cornejo / Kathryn Davis4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdward Busse / Sophia Constantine vs Amilcar Gomez / Tara Ford3-6, 1-6
2026-02-05vs Hunter - Stranger SwingsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSophia Constantine / Charles Hyde vs Ashley Hudgins / Brandon Van6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarry Clark / Linda Blakemore vs Ellen Hoag / Cameron Johnson6-1, 6-2
2026-01-22vs Nankivel - TNT 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian McDermott / Rachael Day vs Joseph Yoshimura / Christina Mellors5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBarry Clark / Linda Blakemore vs Curtis Harris / Emily Sereno3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Mozena / Jamie Mcneill vs Pat Gillespie / Alexis Martin2-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs Hunter - Stranger SwingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian McDermott / Sophia Constantine vs Vivian Hunter / Cameron Johnson7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Blakemore / Barry Clark vs Ashley Hudgins / Luke Sweeney6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Hyde / Jamie Mcneill vs Ellen Hoag / Dj Webster6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nankivel - TNT 7.0 Mixed812439193
2Blakemore - Tie Breakers45101735240
3Hunter - Stranger Swings1842348303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Sophia Constantine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Karen Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Linda Blakemore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Emily Ochsenknecht
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Charles Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Jamie Mcneill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Edward Busse
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jonathan Mozena
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lenny Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachael Day
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachael Day + Edward Busse123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian McDermott
1W–1L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sophia Constantine
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Karen Franklin
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Linda Blakemore
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Emily Ochsenknecht
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Charles Hyde
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Edward Busse
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Mozena
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lenny Peters
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.