Teams

Saddlebrook - L. Barbetta

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-07vs SVB - D. LynhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarney Bailey / Jim Stefan vs Joey Campbell / Chad Paluzzi7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-17vs Tampa Racquet - B. MurdockLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarney Bailey / Jim Stefan vs Michael Laccabue / Bob Murdock5-7, 4-6
2025-05-10vs Hills/Williams/40&Over4.0MWon 10
W#4 DoublesDavid King / Jim Stefan vs Jay Kandell / Brian Deters6-3, 7-5
2025-05-03vs Cheval Knights - M. HayesWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid King / Jim Stefan vs Todd Abrams / Harish Manohar6-3, 7-5
2025-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesRaymond Haga / Jim Stefan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-12vs Tampa Racquet - B. MurdockLost 01
L#4 DoublesJim Stefan / George Zabala vs Hiren Bhatt / Doug Clery6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Vinicius de Souza
published
3.77
Jim Stefan
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.77
Barney Bailey
published 4
3.71
Ray Eckstein
published 4
3.61
Raymond Haga
published
Good Oh
published
James Pettinelli
published
Junghyok Kim
published
Kirby Warms
published
Marcos Pinheiro
published
R Fotheringham
published
Robert Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Alhadeff + Vinicius de Souza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vinicius de Souza
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Jim Stefan
37W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Ray Eckstein
64W–82L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Raymond Haga
51W–38L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Good Oh
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Pettinelli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Junghyok Kim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirby Warms
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcos Pinheiro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
R Fotheringham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.