Teams

Duval/Townsend/65&Over8.0M

2025 Duval Adult 65 & Over - Men · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-18vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Singleton / Lucian Lawley vs Bradley Moe / John Francis Raftery2-6, 4-6
2025-03-11vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Hutto / Dan Singleton vs Bradley Moe / Ron Martin6-0, 6-4
2025-03-04vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDan Singleton / Matt Hutto vs Ron Martin / Bradley Moe6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-27vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDan Singleton / Matt Hutto vs Michael Adee / Eugene Kasper7-6, 6-4
2025-02-20vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Hutto / Dan Singleton vs Eugene Kasper / John Francis Raftery7-6, 6-3
2025-02-05vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDan Singleton / Richard Wellons vs Ron Martin / Bradley Moe6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-02-04vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDan Singleton / Matt Hutto vs Michael Adee / Bradley Moe6-4, 6-1
2025-01-28vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Hutto / Dan Singleton vs Bradley Moe / Michael Adee6-4, 7-6
2025-01-27vs Mulvihill (Fleming)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDan Singleton / James Meekins vs Eugene Kasper / Kevin Mulvihill6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Matt Hutto
published
3.70
Dan Singleton
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.68
Steve Andersen
published
3.66
Tim Fritz
published
3.52
Larry Townsend
published
3.35
Jim Pinkerman
published
3.27
David Phillips
published 3.5
James Meekins
published
Lucian Lawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Singleton + Matt Hutto351854% games+4.4% vs expected
Tim Fritz + Larry Townsend213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Hutto
96W–50L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dan Singleton
136W–103L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Steve Andersen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Tim Fritz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Larry Townsend
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jim Pinkerman
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
David Phillips
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
James Meekins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucian Lawley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.