Teams

DETA at Continental Park

2025 MIAMIDADE Combo 18 & Over - Summer Day · 5.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 2.81 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-14vs Miami/Forman/18&over5.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Fragachan / Miriam Fabregas vs Veronica Montanez / Alexandra Navas0-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs McDevitt (Riviera Country Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMariela Rubio / Maria del Carmen Caballero vs Samantha Murphy / Vanessa Patience7-5, 6-4
2025-07-31vs TeamForman2 at Ron EhmannLost 01
L#2 DoublesGabriela Mendoza / Miriam Fabregas vs Maria Celeste Arraras / Louise Starr3-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs Miami/Forman/18&over5.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesGabriela Mendoza / Elaine Monteiro vs Claudia Donnelly / Alexandra Navas4-6, 4-6
2025-07-17vs McDevitt (Riviera Country Club)Won 21
L#1 DoublesEkaterina Goncharova / Gisleine Silveira vs Samantha Murphy / Vanessa Patience3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNelly Pittack / Laura Micali vs Heather Hansen Bass / Marypage Turso6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPriscila Querasian / Miriam Fabregas vs Jean Voglino / Andria Dickinson6-4, 6-1
2025-06-27vs McDevitt (Riviera Country Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDaniela Garcia / Maria del Carmen Caballero vs Daniela Erana / Ana McDevitt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Fragachan / Miriam Fabregas vs Ivette Arango O'doski / Jean Voglino6-2, 6-1
2025-06-19vs TeamForman2 at Ron EhmannLost 01
L#1 DoublesNelly Pittack / Gisleine Silveira vs Roselin Barrena / Michelle Chica5-7, 4-6
2025-06-12vs Miami/Forman/18&over5.5WLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaniela Garcia / Maria del Carmen Caballero vs Kristen Socorro / Veronica Montanez2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Fragachan / Gisleine Silveira vs Francesca Morello / Katherine Hernandez1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Daniela Garcia
published 3
2.99
Melanie Zaga
published
2.97
Didi Montiel
published 3
2.95
Nelly Pittack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Mariela Rubio
published
2.79
Maria Fragachan
published
2.74
Gabriela Mendoza
published
2.67
2.67
Maria del Carmen Caballero
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Elaine Monteiro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Marcela Rocha
published
2.60
Isabel CRUZ
published
2.50
Priscila Querasian
published
2.46
Gisleine Silveira
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Laura Micali
published
2.25
Beatriz Cabrera
published 2.5
2.21
Miriam Fabregas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.21
Sandra Sainz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Fabregas + Gisleine Silveira3449% games+13.0% vs expected
Nelly Pittack + Maria Fragachan6258% games+12.9% vs expected
Elaine Monteiro + Priscila Querasian3253% games+11.3% vs expected
Maria Fragachan + Ekaterina Goncharova6256% games+11.2% vs expected
Priscila Querasian + Ekaterina Goncharova3359% games+10.4% vs expected
Daniela Garcia + Melanie Zaga7359% games+8.7% vs expected
Didi Montiel + Gabriela Mendoza6546% games−1.6% vs expected
Maria Fragachan + Gabriela Mendoza41442% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniela Garcia
29W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Melanie Zaga
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Didi Montiel
15W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Nelly Pittack
70W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Mariela Rubio
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Maria Fragachan
21W–29L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Gabriela Mendoza
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Ekaterina Goncharova
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Maria del Carmen Caballero
49W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Elaine Monteiro
30W–64L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Marcela Rocha
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Isabel CRUZ
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
Priscila Querasian
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Gisleine Silveira
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
Laura Micali
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Beatriz Cabrera
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Miriam Fabregas
37W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Sandra Sainz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.