Teams

MORAGA CC 18AW3.5A-DT

2021 ADULT 18 & Over Daytime · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Waterbury
published 4
3.67
Lauren Fritch
published
3.64
Connie Koplan
published 4
3.45
Cathy Harris
published 3.5
3.37
Jill Hudson
published
3.35
Denise Acker
published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Barmmer
published
3.22
Kimberley Zembsch
published
3.21
Vanessa Imberg
published
3.17
Cheryl Cushing
published 3.5
3.12
Theresa Brewer
published
3.05
Kimberly Hunter
published
3.04
Celeste Warner
published 3.5
3.00
Karin Hein
published
Lucy Sponsler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Waterbury
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Fritch
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Connie Koplan
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Cathy Harris
9W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jill Hudson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Denise Acker
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
Stephanie Barmmer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Kimberley Zembsch
7W–20L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Vanessa Imberg
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Cheryl Cushing
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Theresa Brewer
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kimberly Hunter
5W–18L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Celeste Warner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Karin Hein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lucy Sponsler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.