Teams

SGV Mo Better Dubs Part Two-DeRosa-WN/SA10

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesAlison Harma / Ami Belcher vs Amy Jones / Kristina Chen6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie Croyder / Shirley Fong vs Monica Johnson / Jennifer Lichtman6-4, 5-3
W#2 DoublesDeann McCormick / Laura del Beccaro vs Cynthia Chou / Amy Jones6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Miller / Laura del Beccaro vs Amy Jones / Brynna Pietz6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTheona Zhordania / Alison Harma vs Kristina Chen / Christine Chen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWenli Chen / Deann McCormick vs Julia Sargsyan / Vicki Peterson3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDeann McCormick / Wenli Chen vs Kristina Chen / Christine Chen5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Avila / Deann McCormick vs Gloria Geller / Emma Silber3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura del Beccaro / Shirley Fong vs Aleyeh Roknaldin / Tegwyn John4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Laura del Beccaro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Sandy Brathwaite
published
4.18
Ghia Godfree
published
4.15
Jennifer Avila
published
4.10
Diana Laguna
published 4.5
4.08
Shirley Fong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Alison Harma
published 4.5
4.02
Leslie Croyder
published
3.96
Deann McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Ami Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Wenli Chen
published
3.82
Debbie Sierra
published 4
3.68
Theona Zhordania
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Linda Lyke
published
Skylar Brathwaite
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ami Belcher + Shirley Fong3356% games+9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura del Beccaro
68W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Sandy Brathwaite
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Ghia Godfree
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jennifer Avila
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Diana Laguna
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.10
4.5
Shirley Fong
89W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alison Harma
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Leslie Croyder
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Deann McCormick
102W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
4.5
Ami Belcher
60W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Wenli Chen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.85
4
Debbie Sierra
34W–45L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Theona Zhordania
117W–121L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Linda Lyke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Skylar Brathwaite
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.