Teams

NJ BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-15vs PH GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Jeanette Palizzi vs Kristine Kuettel / Anne Reese6-1, 6-1
2024-07-25vs LEBTC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Jeanette Palizzi vs Elenita Marsan / Shari Newton5-7, 1-6
2024-07-18vs CCC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Jennifer Stiebeling vs Kerri Luther / Rebecca Shefte6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLynn Dalton vs Kerry Barker6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-11vs LTFC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Deanna Espejo vs Ashley Agrelius / Kate Mayoss7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Fischer / Lynn Dalton vs Alison Finley / Megan Ryall3-6, 3-6
2024-07-10vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Deanna Espejo vs Debra Etzel / Katie Abner7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLynn Dalton vs Susana Wanken6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSARA SCHERFF / Jennifer Stiebeling vs Lisa McGavern / Christie Bianco6-4, 6-2
2024-06-27vs KC-RH REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Deanna Espejo vs Lenora Louie Phelps / Karla Elliot7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Dalton / Jeanette Palizzi vs Lara Callas / Debbie Lew3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Leslie Lane
published
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Deanna Espejo
published 4
3.84
Terming Chew
published 4
3.70
Lynn Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.70
Jennifer Stiebeling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Jeanette Palizzi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Janice Fischer
published
SARA SCHERFF
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanette Palizzi + Lynn Dalton5653% games+3.1% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Deanna Espejo4355% games+0.3% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Jennifer Stiebeling8459% games−1.7% vs expected
Jeanette Palizzi + Jennifer Stiebeling2347% gamesnot enough data
Jeanette Palizzi + Deanna Espejo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Lane
29W–23L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Deanna Espejo
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Terming Chew
84W–76L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Lynn Dalton
30W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Jennifer Stiebeling
175W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Jeanette Palizzi
32W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Janice Fischer
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
SARA SCHERFF
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.