Teams

Patterson - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-11vs Prindiville - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Sue Nast vs Kathy Ross / Thuy Nguyen3-6, 0-6
2025-11-16vs Marsden - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Liz Payne vs Melissa Caster / Liz Edlund4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-09vs Prindiville - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeannette Fabbro / Liz Payne vs Atchara Barrows / Amy R Falzone6-4, 6-2
2025-11-05vs Marsden - SHLWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Powell / Liz Payne vs Kim Gall / Christine Re6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-19vs Prindiville - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Liz Payne vs Tonya Pfeifle / Susan Davis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Marsden - SHLWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeannette Fabbro / Allison McCrory vs Dana Persons / Melissa Caster0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSue Nast / Tonya Chase vs Sissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Penn / Leigh Diamond vs Karen Crane / Liz Edlund6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Karen Penn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Sue Nast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
3.21
Jeannette Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
published
2.91
Liz Payne
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.83
Tonya Chase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Allison McCrory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Regina Dixon
published
Lisa Greskovich
published
Michelle Patterson
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Payne + Allison McCrory213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penn
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jeannette Fabbro
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tonya Chase
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Allison McCrory
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Regina Dixon
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Lisa Greskovich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.