Teams

Tiffany Laeng - Norbeck

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-11vs Pinto - PlayersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelody Fopma / Judi Herishen vs Tracy Koretsky / Salta Liebert1-6, 2-6
2025-12-03vs Laura Davis - ManorLost 12
L#1 DoublesJaimie McDowell / Celeste Kerner vs Katherine Mathis / Glynis Kazanjian4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Harris / Shelley Golinsky vs Laura Davis / Grace Coleman6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Miner / Emily Khayami vs Sarah Yeomans / Julie Georgelakos3-6, 3-6
2025-12-01vs Hall/Sampson - AHCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelody Fopma / Judi Herishen vs Linda Fackler / Karen Rabin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-20vs Cobb - Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesCeleste Kerner / Shelley Golinsky vs Melissa Lim / Lisa Collins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJaimie McDowell / Melody Fopma vs Cara Hur / Shari Freiman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Khayami / Katie Jang vs Kristin Stone / Melissa Cobb1-6, 0-6
2025-11-17vs Wager - CongressionalWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelody Fopma / Katie Scott vs Alison Wager / Benita Stokes6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Harris / Melissa Persak vs Samantha Brown / Cheryl Lynn Boland3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Laeng / Marissa McTernan vs Natalie Green / Devon Lackey6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Laura Davis - ManorLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudi Herishen / Tiffany Laeng vs Glynis Kazanjian / Natalie Silverman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-03vs Pinto - PlayersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudi Herishen / Cindy Miner vs Tracy Koretsky / Sheila Maloney4-6, 2-6
2025-10-30vs Cobb - Wise AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffany Laeng / Celeste Kerner vs Cara Hur / Terri Payne7-6, 1-4
L#2 DoublesJaimie McDowell / Heather Karaszkiewicz vs Merel Young / Melissa Cobb7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarina Weber / Katie Jang vs Kristin Stone / Kelley Stone1-6, 2-6
2025-10-24vs Hall/Sampson - AHCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudi Herishen / Cindy Miner vs Nancy Davis / Debbie Talesnick1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-21vs Wager - CongressionalWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaimie McDowell / Judi Herishen vs Cheryl Lynn Boland / Samantha Brown6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Katie Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Tiffany Laeng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Celeste Kerner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Katie Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Shivaun Wilkinson
published
2.59
Jaimie McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Judi Herishen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Cindy Miner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Marina Weber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Khayami
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Heather Karaszkiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katie Jang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marissa McTernan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Persak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melody Fopma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shelley Golinsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Laeng + Celeste Kerner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Scott
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
Tiffany Laeng
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Celeste Kerner
6W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Katie Harris
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Shivaun Wilkinson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Jaimie McDowell
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Judi Herishen
25W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Cindy Miner
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
Marina Weber
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.33
2.5
Emily Khayami
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Heather Karaszkiewicz
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katie Jang
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marissa McTernan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Persak
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melody Fopma
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Golinsky
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.