Teams

Miracles - Marks

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-14vs TCRC ParksWon 21
L#1 DoublesRoss Overstreet / John Kim vs Andy Tucker / Ravi Ravichandran4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGianni R Snidle / Christopher Kochensparger vs William Cosby / William Wise6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Marks / Christopher Quirk vs Don Ha / AJ James5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-24vs CCV Murphy/ParkerLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Kochensparger / Gianni R Snidle vs Whitson Huffman / Wit Robertson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Quirk / Tracy Marks vs John Reifsnider / Jonathan Henry2-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs Prestige Worldwide - DanielLost 12
L#1 DoublesFahim Rahman / Ryan Marks vs Creighton Anders / Karl Kirkeby5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Chris Pecci vs Casey Hill / Joe Lacroix5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Kochensparger / Christopher Geoghegan vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Eric Miller6-4, 6-2
2025-07-30vs Willow Oaks BlackwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Quirk / Yalier Fuster vs Chad Anderson / Sam Gray6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRoss Overstreet / Fahim Rahman vs Juan Loza / James Rosenstock6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristopher Kochensparger / Chris Pecci vs Terence Blackwood / Anthony Cargill6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Quirk
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Christopher Kochensparger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Ross Overstreet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Chris Pecci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Christopher Geoghegan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Yalier Fuster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Tracy Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Fahim Rahman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gianni R Snidle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Marks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sudhir Vel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Quirk
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Kochensparger
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Ross Overstreet
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Christopher Geoghegan
23W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Yalier Fuster
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Fahim Rahman
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gianni R Snidle
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Marks
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sudhir Vel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.