Teams

CCC Catalano

2022 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Men 40 Winter · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Clif Wiegand
published 4
3.82
Robb Catalano
published
3.75
Bryan Braswell
published 4
3.45
Travis Satterfield
published
3.38
Anthony Wonderly
published 3.5
3.26
Daniel Bekish
published 3.5
3.17
Richard Stevens
published
3.17
Ralph Jones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clif Wiegand
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Robb Catalano
31W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Bryan Braswell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Travis Satterfield
5W–20L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Anthony Wonderly
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Daniel Bekish
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Richard Stevens
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Ralph Jones
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.