Teams

Team Melis

2023 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Men Winter · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men Winter

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-14vs Team DavisWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Partlow / Freddy Feliz vs Arturo Garcia Alonso / Matthew Noordhoff6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-07vs Team ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Bokel / Brian Partlow vs THUC NGUYEN / Jose Ricardo Cornista6-4, 6-0
2023-03-31vs CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Partlow / Chris Panagides vs Viswas Pola / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChris Bokel vs Ugbede Abu3-6, 1-6
2023-03-24vs Heavy N2 TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenny Lam / Brian Partlow vs Diego Aliaga / Tusar Chhotaray7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-04vs CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Partlow / Scott Hataway vs Rohit Munjal / Rahul Sharma6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Melis / Chris Bokel vs Joel Velasquez / Rishi Malhotra4-6, 0-6
2023-02-25vs Heavy N2 TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Bokel / Michael Dunn vs Jason Hecker / Michael Ritenour6-3, 7-5
2023-02-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesBenny Lam / Brian Partlow vs Scott Davis / Stephen Gotts6-1, 6-2
2023-02-11vs Team ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Partlow / William Melis vs Tyrone Crockwell / Bruce Reilly6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Brian Partlow
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.67
Shadab Khan
published
3.56
Chris Bokel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Scott Hataway
published
3.30
Michael Dunn
published
3.28
Freddy Feliz
published
3.25
Benny Lam
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benny Lam + Scott Hataway4450% games+2.2% vs expected
Chris Bokel + Brian Partlow7074% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Partlow
104W–31L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
Shadab Khan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
Scott Hataway
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Dunn
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Freddy Feliz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Benny Lam
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.