Teams

Fee - Luer

2023 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-06vs Suntree - HonakerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonika DeMari / Renee Jiannine vs Carri Grady / Jan Page7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Anastasia Mika5-7, 3-6
2023-02-27vs Titan TC - LeiterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonika DeMari / Renee Jiannine vs Xu Sue Huang / Janis Mena7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Mary Failla2-6, 4-6
2023-02-20vs Rccb - CordisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Conway / Renee Jiannine vs Megan Holthaus / Kerry Sawyer6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Burns / Katharyn Luer vs MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES / Allison Moorhead6-2, 6-1
2023-02-13vs Suntree - FordLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Conway / Katharyn Luer vs Sharon Ford / Caroline Jiborn1-6, 4-6
2023-02-06vs Titan TC - TaylorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Conway / Katharyn Luer vs Carol Whalen / Susan Wilkes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Trisha Watson6-3, 6-3
2023-01-30vs EGYC - LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Conway / Renee Jiannine vs Traci Radcliff / Natalie Oswell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Jan MacKay7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-16vs Brevard/Kube/40&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Erin Conway vs Lori Abbott / Lyuda Saks2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Anne Burns vs Mary Jo Pecoraro / Melissa Meikle6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-01-09vs Kiwi - SalvatoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Erin Conway vs Yvonne Salvatore / Laura Rochester4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.58
Erin Conway
published
2.18
Anne Burns
published 2.5
1.93
Debra Grayson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Daricca Facciobene
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Anne Burns
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Debra Grayson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.