Teams

C 7.5M MM Kun

2022 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5M Combo Spring

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-04-01vs C 7.5M CC KrishnanWon 21
L#1 DoublesSean Nichols / Cloude Banks vs SURENDER VELUSAMY / Adam Slomski2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJason Kun / Aaron Carlson vs Venkatraman Arakoni / Raymond Lumpkin6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRicardo Caldera / Matthew Perciavalle vs Lohit Abhay Kumar / Ganapathi Narayanaswamy6-2, 6-2
2022-03-04vs C 7.5M WR GantousWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Petrefski / Jason Kun vs Jeffrey Tong / Mike Drozda6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Jenkins / Sean Nichols vs Theodore Palace / Steven Parker7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Perciavalle / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Emile Gantous / Tim Lastoria6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-25vs C 7.5M CC KrishnanWon 10
W#1 DoublesCloude Banks / Aaron Carlson vs Sriram Krishnan / Peruri Srinivasulu6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.5M Combo Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cloude Banks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Petrefski
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.72
Matthew Perciavalle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Matthew Horwich
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.60
Michael Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Vish Chandran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Aaron Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Kun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ricardo Caldera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Nichols
published
Sebastian Baumgaertel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sebastian Baumgaertel + Sean Nichols19469% games+10.2% vs expected
Jason Kun + Aaron Carlson10263% games+7.7% vs expected
David Petrefski + Ricardo Caldera314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Kun + Ricardo Caldera224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horwich + Cloude Banks404 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horwich + Ricardo Caldera213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cloude Banks
17W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Petrefski
51W–42L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Perciavalle
59W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Matthew Horwich
118W–150L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Jenkins
59W–53L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Vish Chandran
34W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Aaron Carlson
72W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Kun
55W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ricardo Caldera
88W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Nichols
50W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sebastian Baumgaertel
40W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.