Teams

MHanauer-CHTC

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs PNewsome-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Jamil Qazi vs Patrick Newsome / William Gray4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Benjamin Albright vs Richard McClenny / Ben Cooke3-6, 2-6
2025-04-23vs RSue-Ho-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Ty Bullard vs Matthew James / Parv Mital3-6, 1-6
2025-04-16vs PNewsome-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Alexis Maklakoff vs Patrick Newsome / Evan Wharton7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-09vs RBerliner-UNC/CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Chris Giordano vs Jackson Naftel / Jason Wykoff6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGabriel Dichter / Boyd Blackburn vs Christian Shelby / Grant Sutton6-2, 6-2
2025-04-02vs RSue-Ho-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Daniel Gallo6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Geoffrey Vollman vs Spencer Llewellyn / William Clark2-6, 5-7
2025-03-26vs PNewsome-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Benjamin Redmon vs William Gray / Patrick Newsome1-6, 2-6
2025-03-19vs RBerliner-UNC/CHCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesBoyd Blackburn vs Wes Talman6-7, 4-6
2025-03-12vs RSue-Ho-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Benjamin Redmon vs Stewart Bible / Patrick Shields6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Kelvin Menezes6-1, 6-0
2025-02-26vs RBerliner-UNC/CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Fernandez / Boyd Blackburn vs Jackson Naftel / Casey Black6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Bryant Tran6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Sravan Narayan
published
4.26
Geoffrey Vollman
published
4.19
Gabriel Dichter
published
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 4.5
4.16
Alexis Maklakoff
published 4.5
4.04
Alejandro Fernandez
published 4.5
4.03
Boyd Blackburn
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.98
Reed Breneman
published
3.94
Jamil Qazi
published
3.82
Chris Giordano
published 4
3.75
Ty Bullard
published
Scott Benson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Geoffrey Vollman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Gabriel Dichter
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 13 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alexis Maklakoff
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Alejandro Fernandez
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
Boyd Blackburn
110W–117L career · 8 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Reed Breneman
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Jamil Qazi
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Chris Giordano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Ty Bullard
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.