Teams

2026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Hofmann - EG

2026 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 16 10:00 AM
El Gancho Fitness Swim and Racquet Club
Sep 23 10:00 AM
El Gancho Fitness Swim and Racquet Club
Oct 5 10:00 AM
El Gancho Fitness Swim and Racquet Club
Oct 7 10:00 AM
Highpoint Sports and Wellness
Oct 14 9:00 AM
Jerry Cline Tennis Center
Oct 19 10:00 AM
Highpoint Sports and Wellness
Oct 28 10:00 AM
El Gancho Fitness Swim and Racquet Club
L#1 DoublesKaren Domenici / Zoe King vs Sandra Postel / Janet Smith3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Hofmann / Ellen Parker vs Rayme Romanik / Lorraine Gullett1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Byrne / Jennifer Lind vs Debra Bryan / Jessie Barreras6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Gustafson - HP000000
22026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Hofmann - EG000000
32026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Laurie Byrne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Hargreaves
published 4
3.53
Shirley McDougall
published
3.47
Karen Domenici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Jennifer Lind
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kelly Cain
published
3.26
Nell Sale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Carol Ydens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Hofmann
published
Zoe King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cain + Karen Domenici1742% games+2.9% vs expected
Karen Domenici + Carol Ydens2739% games−12.1% vs expected
Nell Sale + Carol Ydens044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lind + Kelly Cain044 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Byrne + Kelly Cain224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Cain + Carol Ydens134 matchesnot enough data
Nell Sale + Karen Domenici033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lind + Carol Ydens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Byrne
40W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Anna Hargreaves
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley McDougall
18W–24L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Karen Domenici
36W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Lind
41W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Kelly Cain
59W–56L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Nell Sale
57W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carol Ydens
33W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Ellen Parker
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Hofmann
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zoe King
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.