Teams

8.0 SRP Frazee/Lehan W65F

2026 FALL Adult 65&O RECREATION · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-17vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesCandiss Crannell / Christy Radez vs Ellen Mandinach / Cathy Wilson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJo Lehan / Karen Owings-Yoder vs Kathy Abraham / Kathy Berzins5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Frazee / Doreen O'Kelly vs Elizabeth Bannister / Kyle Bohm6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-12-10vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Frazee / Christy Schreiber vs Linda Myres / Kathy Berzins1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCandiss Crannell / Doreen O'Kelly vs Sheila Brown / Kyle Bohm6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Cotter / Christy Radez vs Elizabeth Bannister / Kathy Redinger6-2, 6-0
2025-12-09vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Linnell / Christy Schreiber vs Linda Myres / Ellen Mandinach4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJo Lehan / Candiss Crannell vs Kathy Abraham / Marie Welsh3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Frazee / Susan Cotter vs Elizabeth Bannister / Cathy Wilson5-7, 3-6
2025-12-03vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoreen O'Kelly / Karen Owings-Yoder vs Linda Myres / Cathy Wilson6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristy Radez / Christy Schreiber vs Kathy Abraham / Lynnette Carlson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Cotter / Wendy Linnell vs Elizabeth Bannister / Sheila Brown6-3, 6-0
2025-11-12vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Linnell / Christy Schreiber vs Kathy Berzins / Ellen Mandinach6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Cotter / Candiss Crannell vs Lynnette Carlson / Cathleen Reifsteck2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Frazee / Karen Owings-Yoder vs Kyle Bohm / Kathy Redinger7-5, 6-1
2025-11-05vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoreen O'Kelly / Jo Lehan vs Linda Myres / Ellen Mandinach2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Cotter / Karen Owings-Yoder vs Kathy Abraham / Kyle Bohm7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Frazee / Wendy Linnell vs Marie Welsh / Sheila Brown6-2, 6-1
2025-10-29vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDoreen O'Kelly / Wendy Linnell vs Linda Myres / Cathy Wilson3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Cotter / Christy Schreiber vs Kyle Bohm / Sheila Brown4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-22vs 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65FWon 21
W#1 DoublesJo Lehan / Wendy Linnell vs Elizabeth Bannister / Kyle Bohm7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCandiss Crannell / Karen Owings-Yoder vs Kathy Abraham / Kathy Berzins3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristy Radez / Christy Schreiber vs Lynnette Carlson / Cathleen Reifsteck6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
18.0 SRP Frazee/Lehan W65F53131129219
28.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65F35111330210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Christy Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Pam Rahhal
published
3.81
Christy Radez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Jo Lehan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Karen Owings-Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Candiss Crannell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Doreen O'Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Linda Frazee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Susan Cotter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Linnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doreen O'Kelly + Jo Lehan5152% games+1.3% vs expected
Christy Schreiber + Christy Radez4253% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Linnell + Jo Lehan3255% gamesnot enough data
Doreen O'Kelly + Karen Owings-Yoder3263% gamesnot enough data
Christy Schreiber + Jo Lehan213 matchesnot enough data
Christy Radez + Jo Lehan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christy Schreiber
135W–131L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
Pam Rahhal
164W–69L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christy Radez
44W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Jo Lehan
88W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Karen Owings-Yoder
144W–118L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Candiss Crannell
146W–111L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Doreen O'Kelly
32W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Linda Frazee
58W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Susan Cotter
18W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Linnell
49W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.