Teams

Sarno - Bonvillain

2022 Brevard Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-21vs RCCB - SimmonsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Jim Tulloch vs Thomas Armstrong / Xu Sue Huang4-6, 2-6
2022-10-14vs Brevard - Kiwanis - SantanaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Tulloch / Janis Mena vs Dottie Sorrick / David Parsons2-6, 4-6
2022-10-07vs RCCB - SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Jim Tulloch vs Thomas Armstrong / Cynthia Simmons2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Nick Bonvillain vs Xu Sue Huang / Van Reynolds5-7, 0-6
2022-09-30vs TTC - WhalenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKARY KAUFMANN / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs Larry Sellers / Amy McIntosh1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Jim Tulloch vs Craig McLachlan / Patty Sellers5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Nick Bonvillain vs Barry Whalen / Carol Whalen2-6, 2-6
2022-09-23vs Brevard - Kiwanis - SantanaLost 02
L#2 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Michael Keene vs Kevin Landress / Peggy Wilson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Jim Tulloch vs Dottie Sorrick / Clarence McDaniel2-6, 5-7
2022-09-17vs TTC - WhalenLost 02
L#1 DoublesKARY KAUFMANN / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs Patty Sellers / Devin Swanson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Nick Bonvillain vs Carol Whalen / Larry Sellers6-7, 2-6
2022-09-02vs Brevard - Kiwanis - SantanaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Keene / Janis Mena vs Gisela Alcalde / Kevin Landress0-6, 3-6
2022-08-31vs RCCB - SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Nick Bonvillain vs Cynthia Simmons / Thomas Armstrong0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Michael Keene vs Carol Baggett / James Clemens2-6, 3-6
2022-08-19vs TTC - WhalenLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Jim Tulloch vs Donald Small / Susan Wilkes3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Janis Mena
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Jim Tulloch
published
2.79
Lynda Rippolone
published
2.68
Jane Bonvillain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
KARY KAUFMANN
published
Michael Keene
published
Ron Rushin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
63W–154L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jim Tulloch
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lynda Rippolone
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Jane Bonvillain
42W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
KARY KAUFMANN
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Michael Keene
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Rushin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.